March 20, 20152017
Dear Shareholder:
You are cordially invited to attend the Annual Meeting of Shareholders of The First Bancorp, Inc., which will be held at Samoset Resort, 220 Warrenton Street in Rockport, Maine 04856, on Wednesday, April 29, 2015,26, 2017, at 11:00 a.m. Eastern Daylight Time. The accompanying Notice of Annual Meeting of Shareholders and Proxy Statement describe the matters to be considered and acted upon.
This year we will be voting to elect Directors, to approve (on a non-binding basis) the compensation of the Company’s executives, and to ratify the selection of the Company’s independent auditors. These matters are discussed in greater detail in the accompanying Proxy Statement. The Board of Directors unanimously recommends that you vote FOR each proposal. Your prompt completion and return of the proxy will be appreciated.
It is important that you be represented at the Annual Meeting, regardless of the number of shares that you own and whether or not you are able to attend the meeting in person. Shares held in “street name” by banks, brokers or other nominees who indicate on their proxy cards that they do not have discretionary authority to vote such shares as to a particular matter, which we refer to as “broker non-votes,” will be counted for the purpose of determining whether a quorum exists but will not be considered as present and entitled to vote with respect to a particular matter unless the beneficial owner(s) of the shares instructs such record holder how to vote such shares.
Please take the time to review the material, mark, sign, date, and return the enclosed proxy in the envelope provided for your convenience.
If you have any questions about matters discussed in the Proxy Statement, please contact me at
207-563-3195 or 1-800-564-3195, extension 3169. Your continued support of The First Bancorp, Inc. is sincerely appreciated.
Very truly yours,
/s/ Tony C. McKim
Tony C. McKim
President and Chief Executive Officer
THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK
THE FIRST BANCORP, INC.
Post Office Box 940, 223 Main Street, Damariscotta, Maine 04543
NOTICE OF ANNUAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS
To Be Held Wednesday, April 29, 201526, 2017
To the Shareholders:
Notice is hereby given that the Annual Meeting of Shareholders of The First Bancorp, Inc., the one-bank holding company of The First N.A.,National Bank, will be held at Samoset Resort, 220 Warrenton Street, Rockport, Maine 04856, on Wednesday, April 29, 2015,26, 2017, at 11:00 a.m. Eastern Daylight Time, for the following purposes:
To elect as Directors of the Company the nominees listed in the enclosed Proxy Statement as noted.
To approve (on a non‑binding basis) the compensation of the Company’s executives.
To ratify the Audit Committee’s selection of Berry Dunn McNeil & Parker, LLC as independent auditors of the Company for 2015.2017.
To transact such other business as may properly come before the meeting or any adjournment thereof.
Directors are elected by the vote of the holders of a majority of the outstanding shares of stock entitled to vote at the meeting. To be approved, any other matters submitted to our Shareholders, including the ratification of Berry Dunn McNeil & Parker, LLC, as our independent auditors, require the affirmative vote of the holders of the majority of shares present in person or represented by proxy at the annual meeting and entitled to vote.
Shares that abstain from voting as to a particular matter will be counted for purposes of determining whether a quorum exists and for purposes of calculating the vote with respect to such matter, but will not be deemed to have been voted in favor of such matter. Shares held in “street name” by banks, brokers or other nominees who indicate on their proxy cards that they do not have discretionary authority to vote such shares as to a particular matter, which we refer to as “broker non-votes,” will be counted for the purpose of determining whether a quorum exists but will not be considered as present and entitled to vote with respect to a particular matter unless the beneficial owner(s) of the shares instructs such record holder how to vote such shares. Accordingly, abstentions will have the effect of a vote against a proposal, and broker non-votes will not have any effect upon the outcome of voting with respect to any matters voted on at the annual meeting.
IMPORTANT NOTICE REGARDING THE AVAILABILITY OF PROXY MATERIALS FOR THE SHAREHOLDER MEETING TO BE HELD ON APRIL 29, 2015:26, 2017:
The First Bancorp’s Annual Report to Shareholders and Proxy Statement are available at
http://materials.proxyvote.com/31866P.
By Order of the Board of Directors
/s/ Charles A. Wootton
Charles A. Wootton, Clerk
Damariscotta, Maine
March 20, 20152017
Regardless of the number of shares you own, your vote is important.
Whether or not you expect to attend the meeting, the prompt return of your proxy will save follow-up expenses and assure the proper representation of your shares.
Please mark, date, sign, and promptly return the enclosed proxy, using the postage-paid envelope provided.
You may revoke your proxy if you so desire at any time before it is voted.
The First Bancorp 2015 Proxy Statement • Page 1
THE FIRST BANCORP, INC.
Post Office Box 940, 223 Main Street, Damariscotta, Maine 04543
PROXY STATEMENT
Annual Meeting of Shareholders to be Held Wednesday, April 29, 201526, 2017
This Proxy Statement is being furnished to Shareholders of The First Bancorp, Inc. (the “Company”), the parent company of The First N.A.National Bank (the “Bank”), in connection with the solicitation of Proxies on behalf of the Board of Directors, to be used at the Annual Meeting of Shareholders of the Company to be held at Samoset Resort, 220 Warrenton Street, Rockport, Maine 04856, on Wednesday, April 29, 2015,26, 2017, at 11:00 a.m. Eastern Daylight Time, and at any adjournment thereof for matters described in the Notice of Annual Meeting of Shareholders. This Proxy Statement is first being mailed to Shareholders on March 20, 2015.2017. This solicitation is made by the Company, which will bear the expenses thereof.
The Proxy solicited hereby, if properly signed and returned to the Company and not revoked prior to its use, will be voted in accordance with the instructions contained therein. If no contrary instructions are given, each Proxy received will be voted for the nominees for Directors described herein and for approval of the matters described below and upon the transaction of such other business as may properly come before the meeting, in accordance with the best judgment of the persons appointed as Proxies; provided, however, that broker non-votes will not be voted in favor of the election of Directors. Any Shareholder giving a Proxy has the power to revoke it at any time before it is exercised by (i) filing with the Clerk of the Company a written notice thereof (Charles A. Wootton, The First Bancorp, Inc., Post Office Box 940, 223 Main Street, Damariscotta, Maine 04543); (ii) submitting a duly executed Proxy bearing a later date; or (iii) appearing at the Annual Meeting and giving the Clerk notice of his or her intention to vote in person. Proxies solicited hereby may be exercised only at the Annual Meeting and any adjournment thereof and will not be used for any other meeting.
Only Shareholders of record at the close of business on February 18, 201515, 2017 (the “Voting Record Date”) will be entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting. On the Voting Record Date, there were 10,733,59910,816,111 shares of Common Stock of the Company issued and outstanding. Each share of Common Stock is entitled to one vote at the Annual Meeting on all matters properly presented thereat.
The First Bancorp 2015 Proxy Statement • Page 2
PROPOSAL 1: ELECTION OF DIRECTORS
The health of the Company depends on a strong, independent and attentive Board. The Nominating/Governance Committee of the Board of Directors believes that it is necessary for each of the Company’s Directors to possess a considerable amount of business management and educational experience. In addition, Directors must have sound judgment, wisdom, integrity and ethics. Directors are encouraged to attend seminars and courses to enhance their directorship skills. Each of our outside Directors brings to the Company knowledge from his or her field of expertise, including leadership, finance, marketing and human resources, through the management of their own companies or professional practices. These experiences provide perspective, analytical insight and objectivity when overseeing and evaluating Management. In addition, all Directors serve as referral sources for the Company’s subsidiary. All Directors of the Company also serve on the subsidiary’s Board and meet the requirements for Directors as set forth by the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency. The Board’s familiarity with the Bank’s systems and controls is crucial in maintaining the Company’s safety and soundness. In order to be a candidate for a Director of the Company, each individual must meet the following criteria:
Be a citizen of the United States.
Have the financial capacity to own and/or purchase the minimum equity interest in the Company as specified in the Company’s bylaws.
Be available to attend the monthly meetings of the Board of Directors and Board Committee meetings, as scheduled from time to time.
Have the ability and willingness to represent the interests of the Shareholders of the Company.
Meet any additional criteria that the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency may establish for directors of a national bank.
If any person named as nominee should be unwilling or unable to stand for election at the time of the Annual Meeting, the holder of the Proxy will vote for any replacement nominee or nominees recommended by the Board of Directors. Each person listed below has consented to be named as a nominee, and the Board of Directors knows of no reason why any of the nominees may not be able to serve as a Director if elected.
The Nominating/Governance Committee has nominated the following individuals to be submitted to a vote of the Shareholders at the meeting, each to serve (if elected) for a one (1) year term and until his or her successor is duly elected:
Katherine M. Boyd (63)(65) has served as a Director of the Company and the Bank since 1993. A resident of Boothbay Harbor, she owns the Boothbay Region Greenhouses with her husband and she serves as CFO. Ms. Boyd is past President of the Boothbay Region YMCA and graduated with a BA from Pitzer College in 1973.
The Board concluded that Ms. Boyd is well suited to serve as a director of the Company because of her several decades of experience as the manager of a successful Coastal Maine small business.
Robert B. Gregory (61)(63) has served as a Director of the Company and the Bank since 1987 and served as Chairman of both the Company and the Bank from September 1998 to April 2007. Mr. Gregory has been a practicing attorney since 1980, first in Lewiston, Maine and since 1983 in Damariscotta, Maine. In addition, he and his wife Sim serve as advisors to the Bowdoin Christian Fellowship.
The Board concluded that Mr. Gregory is well suited to serve as a director of the Company because of his legal expertise and extensive transactional experience in financial, banking, and commercial real estate matters.
Renee W. Kelly (46) was nominated by the Nominating Committee to serve as Director of the Company and the Bank in January 2016. Ms. Kelly served as Director of Economic Development Initiatives for the University of Maine from 1997 until July 2016 when she was promoted to Assistant Vice President for Innovation and Economic Development. In addition, she leads the University’s entrepreneurship and innovation support activities as well as its efforts in the Innovation Engineering Institute. She was a founding member of the leadership team for the Blackstone Accelerates Growth initiative in Maine (now Maine Accelerates Growth) and led the creation of the Innovate for Maine Fellows program. Prior to joining the University, she developed training products for Manpower of Connecticut, worked for a financial services start-up company and served as
an aide to then U.S. Senator Olympia J. Snowe. She currently serves on the boards of several economicdevelopment and service organizations, including the Bangor Region Chamber of Commerce, Economic Development Council of Maine, and Ellsworth Business Development Corporation in addition, she is an alternate board member for UpStart Maine.
The Board concluded that Ms. Kelly is well suited to serve as a director of the Company because of her varied experience in economic development.
Tony C. McKim (47)(49) joined the Company as Executive Vice President, Chief Operating Officer and a member of the Board of Directors of the Company and the Bank upon completion of the mergers of FNB Bankshares (“FNB”) and its subsidiary into the Company and the Bank on January 14, 2005. Prior to the mergers, Mr. McKim was President and Chief Executive Officer of FNB and its subsidiary. In June 2014,January 2015, Mr. McKim was promoted to President of the Bank, and in January 2015, he was promoted tonamed President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company and the Bank. Mr. McKim is involved in several local associations, including Harbor House, The Maine Seacoast Mission, Ellsworth Business Development Corporation, Acadian Youth Sports, as
The First Bancorp 2015 Proxy Statement • Page 3
well as the Maine Bankers Association and is a member of the Government Relations Council of the American Bankers Association.
The Board concluded that Mr. McKim is well suited to serve as a director of the Company because of his experience as the former CEO of FNB Bankshares and as a senior officer of the Company with more than two decades in bank management.
Carl S. Poole, Jr. (69) has served as a Director of the Company since its organization in 1985 and has served as a Director of the Bank since 1984. Mr. Poole was President, Secretary and Treasurer of Poole Brothers Lumber, a lumber and building supply company with locations in Damariscotta, Pemaquid and Boothbay Harbor, Maine until the sale of the company in October 2005.
The Board concluded that Mr. Poole is well suited to serve as a director of the Company because of his financial background stemming from years of experience running a retail business from multiple locations.
Mark N. Rosborough (66)(68) has served as a Director of the Company and the Bank since completion of the mergers of FNB and its subsidiary into the Company and the Bank on January 14, 2005. Prior to the mergers, Mr. Rosborough served as Chairman of the Board of Directors of FNB and its subsidiary. Mr. Rosborough is President of J. T. Rosborough Insurance Agency. He is also a partner in Rosborough Rentals,Family Limited Partnership, Penrose and TISA. HeTISA and currently serves on the Ellsworth Economic Development Board and is Treasurer of The Open Door Recovery.Advisors of Maine Mutual Group. He has served on the Ellsworth City Council, the Ellsworth Chamber of Commerce, as well as the Hanover Insurance Company Advisory Board, the Acadia Insurance Advisory Board, the MEMIC Advisory CouncilBoard, the Maine Insurance Agency Board of Directors and the American Red Cross for Hancock and Waldo Counties.
The Board concluded that Mr. Rosborough is well suited to serve as a director of the Company because of his experience as the former Chairman of FNB Bankshares and his overall banking expertise and knowledge, and business experience managing a successful insurance agency.
Cornelius J. Russell (51)(53) was nominated by the Nominating Committee to serve as a Director of the Company and the Bank in February 2014. A second-generation hotelier, Mr. Russell began his career in 1987 with Ocean Properties Ltd. and has held management positions at multiple hotels in Maine, New Hampshire, Colorado, Arizona and Florida. He has beenacted as the General Manager at the Samoset Resort sincefrom 1999 to 2015 where he has overseenoversaw numerous multi-million dollar capital improvement projects, most recently overseeing the construction of La Bella Vita Ristorante, Enoteca wine bar,Wine Bar, The Spa and Luxury guest cottages. In July 2015, he became Regional General Manager providing field support to the Residence Inns by Marriott in Auburn, Bath and Bangor along with the Fairfield Inn by Marriott Bangor. He also supported the Homewood Suites Augusta which opened in August 2016. Mr. Russell’s service on several boards of directors includes Past Presidency of the Maine Innkeeper’sInnkeepers Association and Penobscot Bay Regional Chamber of Commerce, New England Inns and Resorts Association, and the Maine State Chamber of Commerce, andCommerce. He was awarded the 2016 Community Person of the Year by the Penobscot Bay Healthcare BoardRegional Chamber of Trustees. He was awardedCommerce and the 2010 Innkeeper of the Year by the Maine Innkeepers Association. Mr. Russell graduated with a B.S. degree in Resource Economics from the University of Maine.
The Board concluded that Mr. Russell is well suited to serve as a director of the Company because of his varied experience in retail, lodging and hospitality services.
The First Bancorp 2015 Proxy Statement • Page 4
Stuart G. Smith (61)(63) has served as a Director of the Company and the Bank since 1997 and served as Chairman of both the Company and the Bank from May 2007 to April 2013. A resident of Camden, he and his wife, Marianne, own and operate Maine Sport Outfitters in Rockport and Camden, the Lord Camden Inn, the Grand Harbor Inn, 16 Bay View Hotel and Bayview Landing in Camden, as well as the Breakwater Marketplace in Rockland. They are also part owners of the Rockland Harbor Park Center. Currently Mr. Smith is a board member of the nonprofit Camden International Film Festival, and the nonprofit Mid Coast Recreation Center. Mr. Smith holds a BS in economics and history from Duke University and a Master of Environmental Studies from Duke University School of Forestry and Environmental Science. He has served for ten years on the public school board of SAD 28 and The Five Town CSD school board as both a director and chairperson, serving on budget and finance committees, labor negotiations, compensation, planning and facility development and management. He has also served as a board member and president of the Camden, Rockport, Lincolnville Chamber of Commerce and the Camden Area YMCA.
The Board concluded that Mr. Smith is well suited to serve as a director of the Company because of his varied experience in retail, lodging and hospitality services, as well as real estate development and management.
David B. Soule, Jr. (69)(71) has served as a Director of the Company and the Bank since 1989 and has served as Chairman of both the Company and the Bank since April 2013. Mr. Soule has been practicing law in Wiscasset since 1971. Mr. Soule’s law firm focuses on real estate, including land conservation, bank financing and real estate closings; in addition, he deals with trusts and estate planning and represents small businesses. He served two terms in the Maine House of Representatives, is a past President of the Lincoln County Bar Association and is a former Public Administrator for Lincoln County. He served as Trustee of the Wiscasset Public Library and as Selectman, Planning Board Chair and other volunteer positions with the Town of Westport. Mr. Soule is a currently a director of the Maine Wilderness Watershed Trust and Trustee of the Morse High School Scholarship Fund.
The Board concluded that Mr. Soule is well suited to serve as a director of the Company because of his more than four decades as a practicing attorney and extensive knowledge of corporate governance, gained through his chairmanship of the Company’s Audit Committee for many years.
Bruce B. Tindal (64)(65) has served as a Director of the Company and the Bank since 1999. Mr. Tindal has been a licensed real estate broker since 1974. Mr. Tindal formed and is owner of Tindal & Callahan Real Estate in Boothbay Harbor, which has been in operation since 1985. He currently serves on the Boothbay Regional Land Trust Board of Advisors. Mr. Tindal is also a member of the National Association of Realtors, Council of Residential Specialists, Real Estate Buyers Agent Council and the Boothbay Harbor Rotary Club.
The Board concluded that Mr. Tindal is well suited to serve as a director of the Company because of his in-depth knowledge of the coastal Maine real estate market and trends.
* Directors’ ages are as of December 31, 2014.2016.
In order to be elected a Director of the Company, a nominee must receive the affirmative vote of the holders of a majority of the shares of Company’s Common Stock outstanding on the Voting Record Date. Broker non-votes or abstentions will not be counted as affirmative votes.
THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS UNANIMOUSLY RECOMMENDS THAT THE SHAREHOLDERS VOTE FOR PROPOSAL NO. 1
The First Bancorp 2015 Proxy Statement • Page 5
About the Board of Directors and Its Committees
As of the date of this Proxy Statement, The First Bancorp, Inc. had a Board comprised of nine Directors. During 20142016 there were six regular Board meetings and one Annual Meeting. After each regular Board meeting time is provided for an executive session without Management present. The Board’s Attendance Policy states that all members of the Board are strongly encouraged to attend each meeting of the Board and Committees on which they serve. All Directors attended at least 80% of Board meetings and meetings held by Committees of which they were members in 2014.2016. The aggregate attendance at Board and Committee meetings by all members of the Board of Directors and its Committees in 20142016 was in excess of 90%95%. All Directors are expected to attend the 20152017 Annual Meeting of Shareholders, and all Directors except Director Russell were in attendance at the 20142016 Annual Meeting.
Although the Company does not have a formal policy with respect to diversity, the Board and the Nominating/Governance Committee believe it is essential that the Board members represent diverse view points and skill sets (such as gender, race, national origin and education as well as professional experience), and consider each nominee’s/Director’s credentials, competencies and skills as well as the candidate’s area(s) of qualifications and expertise that would enhance the Board’s composition and effectiveness.
Audit Committee. The members of the Company’s Audit Committee for 2015 are2016 were Mark N. Rosborough - Chairman, Robert B. Gregory and David B. Soule, Jr. This Committee met four times during 2014.2016. The Company’s Audit Committee receives and reviews reports on examinations and accounting audits of the Company, and works to ensure the adequacy of operating practices, procedures and controls. The Company’s Board of Directors has adopted a written charter for the Company’s Audit Committee, which was published in the Company’s 2004 Annual Proxy Statementis included as Appendix A beginning on page 41 of this document, and can be found on the Company’s website www.thefirstbancorp.com.(www.thefirstbancorp.com). The 20142016 report of the Audit Committee can be found on page 3638 of this document.
Nominating/Governance Committee. The members of the Company’s Nominating/Governance Committee arefor 2016 were Mark N. Rosborough - Chairman, Carl S. Poole, Jr.Katherine M. Boyd and Stuart G. Smith. This Committee met oncethree times during 2014.2016. As stated in the Nominating/Governance Committee Charter adopted on February 19, 2004, the Committee is responsible for the nomination of Board of Directors members, establishing the tenure and the retirement policies for members of the Board of Directors and reviewing their overall effectiveness. The Nominating charter can be found on the Company’s website www.thefirstbancorp.com.(www.thefirstbancorp.com). Under the Company’s Bylaws, if a Shareholder wishes to nominate a Director for consideration by the Committee, he or she must be a Shareholder of record and have continuously held at least $2,000 in market value of the Company’s Common Stock (as determined by the President) for at least one year as of the date of submittal of such proposal and must continue to hold those securities through the date of such annual meeting. The Committee will also consider if a proposed candidate meets the criteria set forth on page 3 of this document. Each member of the Nominating/Governance Committee is independent as defined under the listing standards of the NASDAQ stock market.
Compensation Committee. The Company’s Compensation Committee is a standing committee of the Bank’s Board of Directors since all executive compensation is paid by the Bank. The members of the Committee consists offor 2016 were Bruce B. Tindal - Chairman, Carl S. Poole, Jr., Mark N. Rosborough, and Stuart G. Smith.Smith and David B. Soule, Jr. This Committee met three timestwice during 2014.2016. No Director of the Bank or the Company serves as a Director on the board of any other corporation with a class of securities registered pursuant to Section 12 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 or that is subject to the reporting requirements of Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, or of any company registered as an investment company under the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended. The function of this Committee is to establish the compensation of the Chief Executive Officer and to review and approve the compensation of other Senior Executive Officers. The Compensation Committee Charter adopted in 2013 can be found on the Company’s website www.thefirstbancorp.com.(www.thefirstbancorp.com).
The First Bancorp 2015 Proxy Statement • Page 6
In addition to the Compensation Committee, there are five other standing committees of the Bank’s Board of Directors: Executive, Audit, Asset/Liability, Trust and Directors’ Loan. Certain members of Management also
serve on some committees of the Bank. There are no family relationships among any of the Directors of the Company.
Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation in Compensation Decisions
No member of the Compensation Committee was, or ever has been, an officer or employee of the Company or the Bank. All Committee members are customers of and engage in transactions with the Bank in the ordinary course of business. As described in “Certain Relationships and Related Transactions”, all loans to such individuals were made on substantially the same terms, including interest rates and collateral, as those prevailing at the time for comparable transactions with persons not related to the Bank and, in the opinion of Management, did not involve more than the normal risk of collectability or present other unfavorable features.
Third Party Compensation of Directors
Under Rule 5250 (b)(3) promulgated by the Securities and Exchange Commission, companies must disclose the material terms of all agreements and arrangements between any Director or nominee for Director, and any person or entity other than the Company (the "Third Party"), relating to compensation or other payment in connection with such person's candidacy or service as a director of the Company. As of the date of this Proxy Statement, none of the Company’s Directors or nominees for Director were receiving such compensation.
Director Independence
The Board reviewed the independence of the Company’s Directors in January 20152017 based on NASDAQ standards. In this review, the Board considered transactions and relationships between each Director (and any member of his or her immediate family) and the Company or the Bank and between certain entities in which any Director or any immediate family member has certain interests, on the one hand, and the Company or the Bank, on the other hand. The purpose of this review was to determine which of such transactions or relationships were inconsistent with a determination that the Director is independent under NASDAQ rules. As a result of the review, the Board affirmatively determined that as of January 20152017 all of the Directors are independent of the Company and the Bank under NASDAQ rules with the exception of President McKim.
Risk Oversight
The Board takes an active role as a whole and also at the committee level in overseeing management of the Company’s risk. The Board regularly reviews information regarding the Company’s liquidity and operations as well as the risks associated with each. While each committee is responsible for evaluating certain risks and overseeing the management of such risks, the entire Board of Directors is regularly informed through committee reports about such risk. The Company’s Compensation Committee is responsible for overseeing the management of risks relating to the Company’s executive compensation practices and plans. The Asset/ Liability Committee is responsible for overseeing financial risk. The Audit Committee oversees reports from examiners and auditors of both the internal audit function and independent outside auditors and federal regulators. The Directors’ Loan Committee monitors lending policies to ensure they are adequate and that the lending function follows sound practices. The Trust Committee reviews activities of the Trust and Investment Department to ensure that all trust functions are conducted in accordance with Bank policy, applicable laws and regulations and in a sound manner consistent with fiduciary standards and duties. The Nominating/Governance Committee manages risk associated with the independence of the Board of Directors and potential conflicts.
The First Bancorp 2015 Proxy Statement • Page 7
Leadership Structure
The Company believes that having an independent Director serving as Chairman of the Board is prudent. The Chairman of the Board is elected by a vote of the Directors to serve a one-year term with a maximum appointment of eight terms. The Chief Executive Officer serves on the Board of Directors; however, his main focus is to provide leadership to the Company for accomplishing the directives established by the Board of Directors and is responsible for the general administration, oversight, care and management of all property and business of the Company, and for all of its departments as well as full authority over all officers, managers and employees.
Code of Ethics
The Company’s Code of Ethics for Senior Financial Officers, which was adopted by the Board of Directors on June 19, 2003, and the Company’s Code of Business Conduct and Ethics, which was adopted by the Board of Directors on April 15, 2004, are incorporated in the Company’s 2006 Annual Report on Form 10-K as Exhibits 14.1 and 14.2, respectively. They are available on the Company’s website at www.thefirstbancorp.com, and a copy may be obtained, free of charge, by written request to the Company.
Audit Committee Financial Expert
Pursuant to Section 407 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and Item 407(d)(5) of Regulation S-K promulgated by the Securities and Exchange Commission, the Company is required to disclose whether it has at least one “Financial Expert” serving on its Audit Committee and if so, the name of the expert and whether the expert is independent of Management. A company that does not have an Audit Committee Financial Expert must disclose this fact and explain why it has no such expert.
At the present time, the Company’s Audit Committee does not have a member who meets the Securities and Exchange Commission’s complete definition of a financial expert. It is the opinion of the Company’s Board of Directors, however, that the Company addresses its audit functions with a depth of penetration and rigor that meets the intent of the requirements of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act for the following reasons:
The Company is a one-bank holding company owning all of the capital stock in the Bank. All Directors of the Bank meet the requirements and qualifications imposed by the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency, the Bank’s principal regulator, which conducts regular supervisory examinations of the Bank. In addition to requiring knowledge of the banking industry and the financial regulatory system, these qualifications require a “background, knowledge, and experience in business or another discipline to oversee the Bank.”
All members of the Audit Committee of the Bank and the Company are independent Directors, as defined by the Securities and Exchange Commission and NASDAQ. The three members operate their own businesses and have knowledge of accounting for both their own businesses as well as for the Bank and the Company. The members of the Audit Committee have considerable experience as Directors of the Bank and the Company.
Internal audit work of the Bank and the Company is outsourced to a professional firm which conducts all internal audits except for loan review, for which a second professional firm performs quality control loan review. Both firms provide detailed periodic reports to the Audit Committee and the Directors’ Loan Committees, respectively.
The Bank is a highly regulated entity which undergoes regular and thorough examination by the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency, with additional oversight by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation. The Company is a “Financial Holding Company” as defined by the Federal Reserve Board and as such is regulated and regularly examined by the Federal Reserve Board.
The Company also continuously reviews, at its own initiative, the expertise of the members of its Board of Directors and its Audit Committee.
The First Bancorp 2015 Proxy Statement • Page 8
Security Ownership of Directors, Management and Principal Shareholders
The following table sets forth the number of shares of Common Stock of the Company beneficially owned as of February 18, 201515, 2017 by (i) each person known by the Company to own beneficially more than 5.0% of the Company’s Common Stock, (ii) each nominee for Director of the Company, (iii) the Named Executive Officers, and (iv) all Executive Officers and Directors of the Company as a group. Except as otherwise indicated below, each of the Directors and Executive Officers and persons owning more than five percent of the Company’s stock has sole voting and investment power with respect to all shares of stock beneficially owned as set forth opposite his or her name.
| | Title of Class | Name of Beneficial Owner | Amount and Nature of Beneficial Ownership | Percent of Class | Name of Beneficial Owner | Amount and Nature of Beneficial Ownership | Percent of Class |
| Common Stock | Katherine M. Boyd | 35,3181 | 3,4772 | | | * | Katherine M. Boyd | 35,3931 | 5,2692 | | | * |
| Common Stock | Robert B. Gregory | 40,4941 | 6492 | 4,4003 | 5,2804 |
| * | Robert B. Gregory | 47,0411 | 6492 | 3,6003 | | * |
| Common Stock | Tony C. McKim | 85,3391 | | | * | Renee W. Kelly | 2,0981 | | | | * |
| Common Stock | Carl S. Poole, Jr. | 276,2551 | 2,6402 | | | 2.60% | Tony C. McKim | 91,9141 | | | | * |
| Common Stock | Mark N. Rosborough | 140,1521 | 4,6422 | 3,6215 | 3,6216 |
| 1.42% | Mark N. Rosborough | 148,0761 | 4,6422 | | | 1.41% |
| Common Stock | Cornelius J. Russell | 1,9381 | | | * | Cornelius J. Russell | 4,1741 | | | | * |
| Common Stock | Stuart G. Smith | 101,0721 | 4562 | | | * | Stuart G. Smith | 104,8131 | 4562 | | | * |
| Common Stock | David B. Soule, Jr. | 24,4711 | 3,5002 | 2257 | | * | David B. Soule, Jr. | 24,9691 | 3,5002 | 2254 | | * |
| Common Stock | Bruce B. Tindal | 23,3011 | 1,0002 | | | * | Bruce B. Tindal | 23,6321 | 1,0002 | | | * |
| Common Stock | Susan A. Norton | 25,6511 | | | * | F. Stephen Ward | 42,1411 | | | | * |
| Common Stock | F. Stephen Ward | 48,8791 | | | * | Charles A. Wootton | 30,3681 | | | | * |
| Common Stock | Charles A. Wootton | 25,2131 | | | * | Susan A. Norton | 28,3551 | | | | * |
| Common Stock | | Richard M. Elder | 17,2291 | | | | * |
| Total Ownership of all Directors and Executive Officers as a Group | Total Ownership of all Directors and Executive Officers as a Group | 880,830 |
| 8.23% | Total Ownership of all Directors and Executive Officers as a Group | 717,305 |
| 6.632% |
| Owners of 5% | BlackRock Fund Advisors8 | 553,822 |
| 5.16% | |
| or More | 400 Howard Street, San Francisco, California | | | |
| Owners of 5% or more | | BlackRock Fund Advisors5 | 698,540 |
| 6.46% |
| 400 Howard Street, San Francisco, California | | |
| The Midwest Trust Company | 616,668 |
| 5.70% |
| 5901 College Blvd, STE 100, Overland Park, Kansas | | |
1 Direct holdings including sole ownership, joint ownership, DRIP, ESPP, Grants and 401(k) Shares
2 Spouse’s holdings
3 Trustee for First Fruit Foundation
4 POA for Claire StickneyHoldings of Director's Firm
5 Trustee for Anna Batchelor TR
6 Trustee for Sam Batchelor TR
7 Company's Holdings
8 Information regarding BlackRock Fund Advisors is based solely upon information obtained from NASDAQ
* Less than one percent of total outstanding shares
The First Bancorp 2015 Proxy Statement • Page 9
Executive Officers
Each Executive Officer of the Company and the Bank is identified in the following table, which also sets forth their respective offices and periods served as an Executive Officer of the Company or the Bank.Bank which includes all such service, and not necessarily only service in such officer's current office and position. The ages shown are as of December 31, 2014.2016.
|
| | |
| Name | Current Office & Position | Period Served |
| | | |
| Tony C. McKim | President & Chief Executive Officer of the Company and the Bank | 2005 to date |
| F. Stephen Ward | Treasurer of the Company, Executive Vice President & Chief Financial Officer of the Company and the Bank | 1993 to date |
| Charles A. Wootton | Executive Vice President and Clerk of the Company,
Executive Vice President and Senior Loan Officer of the Bank | 2000 to date |
| Susan A. Norton | Executive Vice President Human Resources and ComplianceChief Administrative Officer of the Bank | 2002 to date |
| Richard M. Elder | SeniorExecutive Vice President, Retail ServicesTreasurer of the Bank | 2002 to date |
Steven H. PoulinN. Parady | SeniorExecutive Vice President, Senior CreditChief Fiduciary Officer of the Bank | 20122016 to date |
| Tammy L. Plummer | Executive Vice President, Chief Information Officer of the Bank | 2016 to date |
| Sarah J. Tolman | Executive Vice President, Branch Administration of the Bank | 2016 to date |
Tony C. McKim (47)(49) joined the Company as Executive Vice President, Chief Operating Officer and a member of the Board of Directors of the Company and the Bank with the merger of FNB Bankshares on January 14, 2005. In June 2014, Mr. McKim was promoted to President of the Bank, and in January 2015, he was promoted to President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company and the Bank. Prior to the merger, Mr. McKim was President and Chief Executive Officer of FNB Bankshares and The First National Bank of Bar Harbor beginning in 2000.
F. Stephen Ward (61)(63) has served as Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company since 1994 and as Chief Financial Officer of the Bank since 1993. In 2005, Mr. Ward was promoted to Executive Vice President. Mr. Ward has been employed by the Bank since 1990 and served as Marketing Officer from 1990 to 1993.
Charles A. Wootton (58)(60) has been employed by the Bank since January 2000. In 2001, Mr. Wootton was promoted to Senior Vice President of Banking Services and Senior Loan Officer. In 2005, Mr. Wootton was promoted to Executive Vice President. From 1981 to 2000 Mr. Wootton was employed by Camden National Bank, serving as branch manager, commercial loan and business development officer, becoming Vice President responsible for branch administration in 1996.
Susan A. Norton (54)(56) has been employed by the Bank since 1992 and was promoted to Senior Vice President, Human Resources and Compliance in 2005. In January 2009, Ms. Norton was promoted to Executive Vice President.President and in January 2017 she was named Executive Vice President and Chief Administrative Officer. Ms. Norton has also served as Assistant Compliance Officer and Education Officer. She currently holds the position of CRA Officer and Compliance Officer for the Company and is certified as a Senior Professional in Human Resources.
Richard M. Elder (49)(51) has been employed by the Bank since 1993. In 2001, Mr. Elder was promoted to Vice President of Retail Services andin 2001, to Senior Vice President in 2005 and to Executive Vice President in 2016. In January 2017, Mr. Elder was promoted to Seniornamed Executive Vice President.President/Treasurer of the Bank. Mr. Elder previously served as Manager of the Bank’s Boothbay Harbor branch and Senior Commercial Loan Officer.
Steven H. Poulin (59)N. Parady, Esq. (62) has been employed by the Bank since 2002.1997. From 1997 to 1999 Mr. Parady worked as a Commercial Development Officer for The First National Bank of Bar Harbor as well as a being a member of the Bank’s Board of Directors. In February1999 he moved to the Trust division of 2012, Mr. Poulinthe Bank as a Trust Officer.
In 2007 he was promoted to the Senior Trust Officer and Chief Fiduciary of First Advisors. In January 2016 he was promoted to Executive Vice President.
Tammy L. Plummer (51) has been employed by the Bank since 1985 in a variety of roles of increasing responsibility. She was promoted to Senior Vice President, – Senior Credit Officer. Mr. PoulinChief Technology Officer in 2009 and to ChiefInformation Officer in 2015. In January 2016, Ms. Plummer was promoted to Executive Vice President. She currently holds the position of Information Security Officer for the Company and was previously served asthe Data Processing Manager.
Sarah J. Tolman (38) has been employed by the Bank since August of 2014. Ms. Tolman was promoted to Executive Vice President Senior Business Relationship Officer,of Branch Administration in January of 2016. Ms. Tolman oversees the Bank’s Rockportdaily activities of all branch offices as well as the phone banking center. She has sixteen years of banking experience, the last two at First National Bank. Ms. Tolman is a graduate of Husson College and Damariscotta offices.the Mid-Coast Leadership Academy via the University of Maine.
There are no family relationships among any of the Executive Officers, nor are there any arrangements or understandings between any Executive Officer and any other person pursuant to which that Executive Officer has been or is to be elected.
The First Bancorp 2015 Proxy Statement • Page 10
Compensation Discussion and Analysis
Executive Summary
The Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors of The First Bancorp, Inc. oversees the Company’s executive compensation program. The Committee consists solely of “Independent Directors”, i.e., those Directors who are neither officers or employees of the Company or its subsidiaries nor have a relationship which, in the opinion of the Board, would interfere with the exercise of independent judgment to carry out the responsibilities of a Director and who are otherwise “independent” under the rules of the NASDAQ Stock Market, Inc.
The Committee has the direct responsibility to:
| |
| 1. | Review and approve corporate goals and objectives relevant to the compensation of the Company’s Chief Executive Officer (“CEO”), evaluate the CEO’s performance in light of those goals and objectives and determine the CEO’s compensation level based on this evaluation. The corporate goals which are developed to encourage Management to not take undue or excessive risk are established jointly between the Compensation Committee and the CEO and are driven by the Company’s strategic plan and annual operating budget. In addition to the Company-wide goals, the Committee and the CEO jointly agree on individual performance goals for the CEO. Examples of these goals, which may vary from year to year, include the Company’s earnings targets, loan and deposit growth objectives, risk management analysis, as well as specific individual goals such as implementing components of the approved strategic plan and leadership development. |
| |
| 2. | Review and approve the compensation of all other Executive Officers of the Company with recommendations and input from the CEO. |
| |
| 3. | Review and approve grants, awards and issuances under, or any material amendment of, the equity basedequity-based long-term and short-term incentive plans, which are described below. In consultation with Management, oversee regulatory compliance with respect to compensation matters, including overseeing the Company’s policies on structuring compensation programs to preserve tax deductibilitytax-deductibility and, as and when required, establish performance goals and certify that performance goals have been attained for purposes of Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code. |
| |
| 4. | Establish and review FNLCCompany stock ownership guidelines for the CEO and other Executive Officers of the Company. |
| |
| 5. | Review and approve any severance or similar termination payments proposed to be made to any current or former Executive Officer of the Company, and any agreements providing for such payments. |
Philosophy of Our Executive Compensation Program
The Company recognizes that the attraction and retention of high-performing employees are among the key components of the organization’s past performance and future success. In support of that objective, the Compensation Committee believes that the most effective executive compensation program is one that rewards annually the achievement of established long-term and strategic goals, and aligns executives’ interests with those of Shareholders and the long-term interests of the Company. The Committee evaluates both performance and compensation of our executives relative to the compensation paid to similar executives at comparably sized and similarly performing banks. Our goal is to maintain an appropriate relationship between the compensation of our executives and the Company’s performance. The overall objectives of our compensation program are:
| |
| a) | To provide both short-term and long-term alignment between pay and performance; |
| |
| b) | To align executive interests with those of Shareholders; |
| |
| c) | To remain competitive within the relevant marketplace in terms of total compensation; and |
| |
| d) | To enable the Company to attract, retain, and motivate top talent. |
The First Bancorp 2015 Proxy Statement • Page 11
The elements of our compensation program are discussed in more detail below, but in summary, the elements of our program are as follows:
| |
| a) | Base Pay will target slightly above the market median (55thto 75thpercentile)of the Company’s peer group, established by Pearl Meyer & Partners and described below, and will reflect the individual executive’s role, experience and contribution to the Company. |
group, established by Pearl Meyer & Partners and described below, and will reflect the individual executive’s role, experience and contribution to the Company.
| |
| b) | Short-term incentives will reflect annual goals related to the Company’s profitability and asset quality as well as the achievement of individual goals for each named executive. |
| |
| c) | Long-term incentives which focus on achievement of longer-term objectives and seek to reduce incentives driven by short-term developments may be awarded on an annual basis and are intended to promote the retention of the executive team. |
| |
| d) | The Committee will determine an appropriate mix of base pay, short-term and long-term incentives based on the executive’s position and tenure inwith the Company. |
| |
| e) | Other benefits will be competitive and appropriate to retain and attract talented individuals. |
| |
| f) | All elements of our compensation are evaluated by the Compensation Committee to ensure they are not designed to encourage or incentivize Management to cause the Company to take excessive or undue risk. |
| |
| g) | In addition to the compensation program, the Compensation Committee has also established stock ownership guidelines for the CEO and other Senior Executive Officers (SEOs). These ownership guidelines further align the SEO's performance with the long term goals of the Company. |
Total compensation is expected to vary each year, and evolve over the long-term to reflect our performance relative to our peers and the industry with corresponding returns for our Shareholders.
Considerations in Determining Executive Compensation
In 2014,2016, Pearl Meyer, & Partners, a consulting firm specializing in compensation and benefits for financial institutions, conducted a comprehensive total senior executive compensation analysis for the Company. The peer group utilized by the Company wasconsisted of publicly traded non-metropolitan bank holding companies located in New England, New York and Pennsylvania. The results of this review were used to guide the Committee’s refinement of the Company’s compensation philosophy and resulting compensation programs for senior executives.
Compensation Benchmarking:Understanding and having a comparative analysis of the compensation of senior banking executives in the banking industry is a key element considered by the Committee in making compensation decisions. Similar to the Company’s past internal practices, Pearl Meyer & Partners assisted the Committee with defining a peer group of institutions of similar asset size and regional location. The peer group includes the two comparable banks located in the state of Maine and other banks located in similar non-metropolitan areas in the Northeast. The comparable companies are reviewed annually and may change slightly depending on changes either in the market or in the peer group banks themselves. The peer group targets approximately 20 institutions ranging from two-thirds to two times the Company’s size in terms of assets. The overall objective is to position the Company at approximately the median salary levels of the peer group.
Performance factors will also be taken into account should a company in the peer group have performance that varies greatly from that of the group and/or the Company. We may discount a defined peer bank or drop a company from the group should performance vary widely.
The First Bancorp 2015 Proxy Statement • Page 12
The peer group used for 20142016 was as follows:
|
| |
Financial Institutions, Inc.Lake Sunapee Bank Group | Camden National Corporation |
UnitedOrrstown Financial Bancorp,Services, Inc. | Arrow Financial Corporation |
| ACNB Corporation | CNB Financial Corporation |
| Enterprise Bancorp, Inc. | BridgeEvans Bancorp, Inc. |
SuffolkCodorus Valley Bancorp, Inc. | Merchants Bancshares, Inc. |
| ESSA Bancorp, Inc. | Bar Harbor Bankshares |
WestfieldAmeriserv Financial, Inc. | Chemung Financial Corporation |
| Hingham Institution for Savings | Citizens & Northern Corporation |
New Hampshire Thrift Bankshares, Inc. | Penns Woods Bancorp, Inc. |
Orrstown Financial Services, Inc. | Evans Bancorp, Inc. |
In addition to the peer group, the consultant included data from other industry data bases and surveys including Watson Wyatt Financial Institutions Benchmark Survey and Pearl Meyer & Partners’Meyer’s own annual survey. Data and competitive perspectives were assessed relative to base salary, total cash compensation, short- and long-termlong- term incentives, total direct compensation, benefits and other compensation and total compensation. The Committee reviewed data individually and in the aggregate. Data from the review was used to develop pay guidelines and as a reference for decisions for both short-term and long-term compensation.
Elements of the Compensation Program –- Detail
Base Pay: Base salary is used to recognize the experience, skills, knowledge and responsibilities required of all our employees, including our executives. When establishing base salaries for 2014,2016, as noted previously, the Compensation Committee engaged the services of Pearl Meyer & Partners to conduct a comprehensive compensation analysis. One result of this analysis was the establishment of a peer group, detailed above, and the Committee made a decision to target base salaries just above the market median (55thto 75thpercentile) of that peer group’s base compensation for similarly positioned executives. In addition to the peer group comparison, a variety of other factors are used to determine base compensation, including: the seniority of the individual, the level of the officer’s responsibility and the performance of the officer in meeting his/her annual goals. The annual goals of the SEOs, other than the CEO, are set jointly by the CEO and the Named Officer, and reviewed by the Compensation Committee. These goals are aligned with the Company’s annualgoals and individualized for the area of responsibility of the SEO. For example, goals of the Senior Loan Officer center on loan growth targets and loan quality parameters, the latter being measured on the basis of loan delinquency rates, level of non-performing loans and amount of loan charge-offs for the year. The CFO has goals based on asset/liability management, investment portfolio performance and quality of financial reporting. As a high-performing Company with consistent results, specifically in the categories of Return on Assets, Return on Equity and Efficiency Ratio that are typically in the upper third of our peer group, we believe that the base salaries of our executives should be reflective of our performance within our industry. Base salaries are reviewed at least annually by the Compensation Committee. The Compensation Committee, with assistance from Pearl Meyer, & Partners, has worked to design an effective program to motivate and retain SEOs, which may utilize long-term restricted stock.
Short-Term Incentives:Incentives
In 2012, the Board of Directors approved a Short-Term Incentive Plan. The five SEOs and certain other senior executives are eligible for incentives under this program,which is part of a total compensation package including base salary, annual incentives, equity and benefits. The philosophy of the Compensation Committee was to set competitive, reasonable base salaries and allow for the potential of meaningful incentives tied to the Company’s short-term initiatives to optimize profitability, growth, and excellence in individual performance, and to promote teamwork among its participants.
The First Bancorp 2015 Proxy Statement • Page 13
The plan is designed to:
| |
| ▪ | Ensure clarity of expectations in terms of expected results; |
| |
| ▪ | Recognize and reward achievement of annual business goals; |
| |
| ▪ | Motivate and reward superior performance; |
| |
| ▪ | Encourage teamwork and collaboration among the Company’s leadership and across business groups; |
| |
| ▪ | Attract and retain talent needed to grow The First;the Company/Bank; |
| |
| ▪ | Be competitive with market; and |
| |
| ▪ | Ensure incentives are appropriately risk-balanced (i.e., do not motivate or reward excessive risk taking). |
Employees who are eligible for incentive awards are subject to meeting the following requirements:
| |
| ▪ | New hires must be employed prior to October 1st to be eligible to participate in the plan for the performance period. Employees hired after that date must wait until the next calendar year to be eligible for an award under the plan. Eligibility begins the first full month worked. Participants receive a pro-rated award using full months worked during the plan year. |
| |
| ▪ | Awards under the plan shall be limited to individuals employed by The Firstthe Company/Bank on the date of payment, except in the case of disability, death, or retirement. |
| |
| ▪ | Participants on a performance improvement plan or with an unsatisfactory performance rating at the time of payment or who have given notice of resignation at the time of payment are not eligible to receive an award. |
Each participant hadhas a target incentive opportunity based on his or her role. The target incentive reflectedreflects a percentage of base salary determined to be consistent with competitive market practices. Actual awards are based on achievement of specific goals and could range from 0%, for not achieving minimal performance, to 150% of target, for exceptional performance. Each participant hadhas five predefined performance goals used to determine his or her short-term incentive award in three performance categories: Company-wide, individual specific, and discretionary. The goals wereare then weighted to reflect the focus and contribution for each position in the Company.
The plan is based on a balance of multiple measures, layered oversight, and reasonable ceilings for exceptional performance. The plan is structured to discourage excessive risk taking. The Compensation Committee reviewed the plan design to insure it is in line with best practices for risk. The altering, inflating, and/or inappropriate manipulation of performance/financial results or any other violation of recognized ethical business standards will subject any participant to disciplinary action up to and including termination of employment. In addition, any incentive compensation as provided by the plan to which such a participant would otherwise be entitled will be revoked or subject to “claw back.”
The Short-term Incentive Plan operates on a calendar year schedule (January 1 - December 31). Annual cash incentive awards will be paid out by March 15th immediately following the planPlan year. Awards granted under this program are intended to be in the form of cash; however while the Bank participated in the CPP program the SEOs were not eligible for cash bonuses, so awards granted in these years were in the form of restricted stock.cash.
Since all SEO compensation is paid by the Bank, not the Company, the performance measures for the Short-Term Incentive Plan are based on the Bank's, not the Company's, 20142016 performance. The following tables summarize the performance measures, and weightings, as well as potential and total payouts for each SEO in 2014:2016:
The First Bancorp 2015 Proxy Statement • Page 14
| | | Officer | | Percent of Base | | Amount | | Percent of Base | | Amount |
| Daniel Daigneault | 2014 Base Salary | | | $ | 425,000 |
| |
| Tony McKim | | 2016 Base Salary | | | $ | 430,000 |
|
| Chief Executive Officer | 2014 Incentive Target | 30.00 | % | | $ | 127,500 |
| 2016 Incentive Target | 30.00 | % | | $ | 129,000 |
|
| | 2014 Actual Payout | 39.10 | % | | $ | 166,044 |
| 2016 Actual Payout | 43.50 | % | | $ | 187,038 |
|
| Performance Measures | Threshold | Target | Stretch | | Weight | Threshold | Target | Stretch | | Weight |
| Net income | $ | 13,000,000 |
| $ | 14,000,000 |
| $ | 15,000,000 |
| | 40.00 | % | $ | 16,540 |
| $ | 17,540 |
| $ | 18,540 |
| | 20.00 | % |
| Return on Average Assets | 0.91 | % | 0.96 | % | 1.01 | % | | 15.00 | % | |
| Return on Average Equity | | 11.32 | % | 12.32 | % | 13.32 | % | | 10.00 | % |
| Efficiency Ratio | 57.86 | % | 54.86 | % | 51.86 | % | | 15.00 | % | 53.41 | % | 51.41 | % | 49.41 | % | | 10.00 | % |
| Non-performing Assets to Total Assets YTD Avg | 1.74 | % | 1.24 | % | 0.74 | % | | 10.00 | % | |
| Fee Income From Four Key Areas | | 8,581 |
| 8,881 |
| 9,181 |
| | 10.00 | % |
| Implementation of Strategic Plan | | 50.00 | % | 100.00 | % | 150.00 | % | | 30.00 | % |
| Discretionary | 50.00 | % | 100.00 | % | 150.00 | % | | 20.00 | % | 50.00 | % | 100.00 | % | 150.00 | % | | 20.00 | % |
| Incentive Opportunity Range | Threshold | Target | Stretch | | | Threshold | Target | Stretch | | |
| Net income | $ | 25,500 |
| $ | 51,000 |
| $ | 76,500 |
| | | $ | 12,900 |
| $ | 25,800 |
| $ | 38,700 |
| | |
| Return on Average Assets | 9,563 |
| 19,125 |
| 28,688 |
| | | |
| Return on Average Equity | | 6,450 |
| 12,900 |
| 19,350 |
| | |
| Efficiency Ratio | 9,563 |
| 19,125 |
| 28,688 |
| | | 6,450 |
| 12,900 |
| 19,350 |
| | |
| Non-performing Assets to Total Assets YTD Avg | 6,375 |
| 12,750 |
| 19,125 |
| | | |
| Fee Income From Four Key Areas | | 6,450 |
| 12,900 |
| 19,350 |
| | |
| Implementation of Strategic Plan | | 19,350 |
| 38,700 |
| 58,050 |
| | |
| Discretionary | 12,750 |
| 25,500 |
| 38,250 |
| | | 12,900 |
| 25,800 |
| 38,700 |
| | |
| | $ | 63,750 |
| $ | 127,500 |
| $ | 191,250 |
| | | $ | 64,500 |
| $ | 129,000 |
| $ | 193,500 |
| | |
| Actual Achievement | Actual Performance | Payout Allocation | Weighted Payout Percent | | Actual Payout | Actual Performance | Payout Allocation | Weighted Payout Percent | | Actual Payout |
| Net income | $ | 15,072,000 |
| 150.00 | % | 60.00 | % | | $ | 76,500 |
| $ | 18,344 |
| 140.20 | % | 28.00 | % | | $ | 36,169 |
|
| Return on Average Assets | 1.04 | % | 150.00 | % | 22.50 | % | | 28,688 |
| |
| Return on Average Equity | | 12.77 | % | 122.50 | % | 12.20 | % | | 15,801 |
|
| Efficiency Ratio | 54.22 | % | 110.70 | % | 16.60 | % | | 21,170 |
| 49.53 | % | 147.00 | % | 14.70 | % | | 18,968 |
|
| Non-performing Assets to Total Assets YTD Avg | 1.13 | % | 111.30 | % | 11.10 | % | | 14,186 |
| |
| Fee Income From Four Key Areas | | 9,700 |
| 150.00 | % | 15.00 | % | | 19,350 |
|
| Implementation of Strategic Plan | | 150.00 | % | 150.00 | % | 45.00 | % | | 58,050 |
|
| Discretionary | 100.00 | % | 100.00 | % | 20.00 | % | | 25,500 |
| 150.00 | % | 150.00 | % | 30.00 | % | | 38,700 |
|
| | | 130.2 | % | | $ | 166,044 |
| | 144.90 | % | | $ | 187,038 |
|
| | | Officer | | Percent of Base | | Amount | | Percent of Base | | Amount |
| Tony McKim | 2014 Base Salary | | | $ | 260,415 |
| |
| Chief Operating Officer | 2014 Incentive Target | 25.00 | % | | $ | 65,104 |
| |
| F. Stephen Ward | | 2016 Base Salary | | | $ | 254,400 |
|
| Chief Financial Officer | | 2016 Incentive Target | 25.00 | % | | $ | 63,600 |
|
| | 2014 Actual Payout | 33.70 | % | | $ | 87,655 |
| 2016 Actual Payout | 32.60 | % | | $ | 82,992 |
|
| Performance Measures | Threshold | Target | Stretch | | Weight | Threshold | Target | Stretch | | Weight |
| Net income | $ | 13,000,000 |
| $ | 14,000,000 |
| $ | 15,000,000 |
| | 40.00 | % | $ | 16,540 |
| $ | 17,540 |
| $ | 18,540 |
| | 20.00 | % |
| Return on Average Assets | 0.91 | % | 0.96 | % | 1.01 | % | | 15.00 | % | |
| Return on Average Equity | | 11.32 | % | 12.32 | % | 13.32 | % | | 10.00 | % |
| Efficiency Ratio | 57.86 | % | 54.86 | % | 51.86 | % | | 20.00 | % | 53.41 | % | 51.41 | % | 49.41 | % | | 10.00 | % |
| Meeting Bangor Deposit Goals | 50.00 | % | 100.00 | % | 150.00 | % | | 10.00 | % | |
| Fee Income From Four Key Areas | | 8,581 |
| 8,881 |
| 9,181 |
| | 10.00 | % |
| Implementation of Strategic Plan | | 50.00 | % | 100.00 | % | 150.00 | % | | 15.00 | % |
| UBPR Investment Yield Spread to Peers | | 0.50 | % | 1.00 | % | 1.50 | % | | 15.00 | % |
| Discretionary | 50.00 | % | 100.00 | % | 150.00 | % | | 15.00 | % | 50.00 | % | 100.00 | % | 150.00 | % | | 20.00 | % |
| Incentive Opportunity Range | Threshold | Target | Stretch | | | Threshold | Target | Stretch | | |
| Net income | $ | 13,021 |
| $ | 26,042 |
| $ | 39,062 |
| | | $ | 6,360 |
| $ | 12,720 |
| $ | 19,080 |
| | |
| Return on Average Assets | 4,883 |
| 9,766 |
| 14,648 |
| | | |
| Return on Average Equity | | 3,180 |
| 6,360 |
| 9,540 |
| | |
| Efficiency Ratio | 6,510 |
| 13,021 |
| 19,531 |
| | | 3,180 |
| 6,360 |
| 9,540 |
| | |
| Meeting Bangor Deposit Goals | 3,255 |
| 6,510 |
| 9,766 |
| | | |
| Fee Income From Four Key Areas | | 3,180 |
| 6,360 |
| 9,540 |
| | |
| Implementation of Strategic Plan | | 4,770 |
| 9,540 |
| 14,310 |
| | |
| UBPR Investment Yield Spread to Peers | | 4,770 |
| 9,540 |
| 14,310 |
| | |
| Discretionary | 4,883 |
| 9,766 |
| 14,648 |
| | | 6,360 |
| 12,720 |
| 19,080 |
| | |
| | $ | 32,552 |
| $ | 65,104 |
| $ | 97,656 |
| | | $ | 31,800 |
| $ | 63,600 |
| $ | 95,400 |
| | |
| Actual Achievement | Actual Performance | Payout Allocation | Weighted Payout Percent | | Actual Payout | Actual Performance | Payout Allocation | Weighted Payout Percent | | Actual Payout |
| Net income | $ | 15,072,000 |
| 150.00 | % | 60.00 | % | | $ | 39,062 |
| $ | 18,344 |
| 140.20 | % | 28.00 | % | | $ | 17,832 |
|
| Return on Average Assets | 1.04 | % | 150.00 | % | 22.50 | % | | 14,648 |
| |
| Return on Average Equity | | 12.77 | % | 122.50 | % | 12.20 | % | | 7,790 |
|
| Efficiency Ratio | 54.22 | % | 110.70 | % | 22.10 | % | | 14,413 |
| 49.53 | % | 147.00 | % | 14.70 | % | | 9,352 |
|
| Meeting Bangor Deposit Goals | 150.00 | % | 150.00 | % | 15.00 | % | | 9,766 |
| |
| Fee Income From Four Key Areas | | 9,700 |
| 150.00 | % | 15.00 | % | | 9,540 |
|
| Implementation of Strategic Plan | | 100.00 | % | 100.00 | % | 15.00 | % | | 9,540 |
|
| UBPR Investment Yield Spread to Peers | | 1.90 | % | 150.00 | % | 22.50 | % | | 14,310 |
|
| Discretionary | 100.00 | % | 100.00 | % | 15.00 | % | | 9,766 |
| 115.00 | % | 115.00 | % | 23.00 | % | | 14,628 |
|
| | | 134.6 | % | | $ | 87,655 |
| | 130.40 | % | | $ | 82,992 |
|
The First Bancorp 2015 Proxy Statement • Page 15
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Officer | | | Percent of Base | | Amount |
| F. Stephen Ward | 2014 Base Salary | | | $ | 240,000 |
|
| Chief Financial Officer | 2014 Incentive Target | 25.00 | % | | $ | 60,000 |
|
| | 2014 Actual Payout | 33.70 | % | | $ | 80,783 |
|
| Performance Measures | Threshold | Target | Stretch | | Weight |
| Net income | $ | 13,000,000 |
| $ | 14,000,000 |
| $ | 15,000,000 |
| | 40.00 | % |
| Return on Average Assets | 0.91 | % | 0.96 | % | 1.01 | % | | 15.00 | % |
| Efficiency Ratio | 57.86 | % | 54.86 | % | 51.86 | % | | 20.00 | % |
| UBPR Investment Yield Spread to Peers | 0.5 | % | 1 | % | 1.5 | % | | 10.00 | % |
| Discretionary | 50.00 | % | 100.00 | % | 150.00 | % | | 15.00 | % |
| Incentive Opportunity Range | Threshold | Target | Stretch | | |
| Net income | $ | 12,000 |
| $ | 24,000 |
| $ | 36,000 |
| | |
| Return on Average Assets | 4,500 |
| 9,000 |
| 13,500 |
| | |
| Efficiency Ratio | 6,000 |
| 12,000 |
| 18,000 |
| | |
| UBPR Investment Yield Spread to Peers | 3,000 |
| 6,000 |
| 9,000 |
| | |
| Discretionary | 4,500 |
| 9,000 |
| 13,500 |
| | |
| | $ | 30,000 |
| $ | 60,000 |
| $ | 90,000 |
| | |
| Actual Achievement | Actual Performance | Payout Allocation | Weighted Payout Percent | | Actual Payout |
| Net income | $ | 15,072,000 |
| 150.00 | % | 60.00 | % | | $ | 36,000 |
|
| Return on Average Assets | 1.04 | % | 150.00 | % | 22.50 | % | | 13,500 |
|
| Efficiency Ratio | 54.22 | % | 110.70 | % | 22.10 | % | | 13,283 |
|
| UBPR Investment Yield Spread to Peers | 1.57 | % | 150.00 | % | 15.00 | % | | 9,000 |
|
| Discretionary | 100.00 | % | 100.00 | % | 15.00 | % | | 9,000 |
|
| | | | 134.60 | % | | $ | 80,783 |
|
| | | Officer | | Percent of Base | | Amount | | Percent of Base | | Amount |
| Charles Wootton | 2014 Base Salary | | | $ | 227,000 |
| 2016 Base Salary | | | $ | 241,100 |
|
| Senior Loan Officer | 2014 Incentive Target | 25.00 | % | | $ | 56,750 |
| 2016 Incentive Target | 25.00 | % | | $ | 60,275 |
|
| | 2014 Actual Payout | 29.80 | % | | $ | 67,626 |
| 2016 Actual Payout | 31.40 | % | | $ | 75,618 |
|
| Performance Measures | Threshold | Target | Stretch | | Weight | Threshold | Target | Stretch | | Weight |
| Net income | $ | 13,000,000 |
| $ | 14,000,000 |
| $ | 15,000,000 |
| | 40.00 | % | $ | 16,540 |
| $ | 17,540 |
| $ | 18,540 |
| | 20.00 | % |
| Non-performing Assets to Total Assets YTD Avg | 1.74 | % | 1.24 | % | 0.74 | % | | 15.00 | % | |
| Past Due Loans YTD Avg | 2.25 | % | 1.50 | % | 0.75 | % | | 15.00 | % | |
| Commercial Loans YTD Avg | 378,570,000 |
| 393,592,000 |
| 408,614,000 |
| | 15.00 | % | |
| Return on Average Equity | | 11.32 | % | 12.32 | % | 13.32 | % | | 10.00 | % |
| Efficiency Ratio | | 53.41 | % | 51.41 | % | 49.41 | % | | 10.00 | % |
| Fee Income From Four Key Areas | | 8,581 |
| 8,881 |
| 9,181 |
| | 10.00 | % |
| Loan Growth YTD Average | | 45,144 |
| 60,144 |
| 75,144 |
| | 10.00 | % |
| Past Due Loans/Total Loans YTD Average | | 1.43 | % | 1.18 | % | 0.93 | % | | 10.00 | % |
| Classified Loans to Equity | | 22.00 | % | 19.00 | % | 16.00 | % | | 10.00 | % |
| Discretionary | 50.00 | % | 100.00 | % | 150.00 | % | | 15.00 | % | 50.00 | % | 100.00 | % | 150.00 | % | | 20.00 | % |
| Incentive Opportunity Range | Threshold | Target | Stretch | | | Threshold | Target | Stretch | | |
| Net income | $ | 11,350 |
| $ | 22,700 |
| $ | 34,050 |
| | | $ | 6,028 |
| $ | 12,055 |
| $ | 18,083 |
| | |
| Non-performing Assets to Total Assets YTD Avg | 4,256 |
| 8,513 |
| 12,769 |
| | | |
| Past Due Loans YTD Avg | 4,256 |
| 8,513 |
| 12,769 |
| | | |
| Commercial Loans YTD Avg | 4,256 |
| 8,513 |
| 12,769 |
| | | |
| Return on Average Equity | | 3,014 |
| 6,028 |
| 9,041 |
| | |
| Efficiency Ratio | | 3,014 |
| 6,028 |
| 9,041 |
| | |
| Fee Income From Four Key Areas | | 3,014 |
| 6,028 |
| 9,041 |
| | |
| Loan Growth YTD Average | | 3,014 |
| 6,028 |
| 9,041 |
| | |
| Past Due Loans/Total Loans YTD Average | | 3,014 |
| 6,028 |
| 9,041 |
| | |
| Classified Loans to Equity | | 3,014 |
| 6,028 |
| 9,041 |
| | |
| Discretionary | 4,256 |
| 8,513 |
| 12,769 |
| | | 6,028 |
| 12,055 |
| 18,083 |
| | |
| | $ | 28,375 |
| $ | 56,750 |
| $ | 85,125 |
| | | $ | 30,140 |
| $ | 60,278 |
| $ | 90,412 |
| | |
| Actual Achievement | Actual Performance | Payout Allocation | Weighted Payout Percent | | Actual Payout | Actual Performance | Payout Allocation | Weighted Payout Percent | | Actual Payout |
| Net income | $ | 15,072,000 |
| 150.00 | % | 60.00 | % | | $ | 34,050 |
| $ | 18,344 |
| 140.20 | % | 28.00 | % | | $ | 16,900 |
|
| Non-performing Assets to Total Assets YTD Avg | 1.13 | % | 111.30 | % | 16.70 | % | | 9,472 |
| |
| Past Due Loans YTD Avg | 1.38 | % | 107.80 | % | 16.20 | % | | 9,175 |
| |
| Commercial Loans YTD Avg | 386,196,000 |
| 75.40 | % | 11.30 | % | | 6,417 |
| |
| Return on Average Equity | | 12.77 | % | 122.50 | % | 12.20 | % | | 7,383 |
|
| Efficiency Ratio | | 49.53 | % | 147.00 | % | 14.70 | % | | 8,863 |
|
| Fee Income From Four Key Areas | | 9,700 |
| 150.00 | % | 15.00 | % | | 9,041 |
|
| Loan Growth YTD Average | | 71,674 |
| 138.40 | % | 13.80 | % | | 8,344 |
|
| Past Due Loans/Total Loans YTD Average | | 1.07 | % | 122.20 | % | 12.20 | % | | 7,364 |
|
| Classified Loans to Equity | | 19.40 | % | 94.00 | % | 9.40 | % | | 5,668 |
|
| Discretionary | 100.00 | % | 100.00 | % | 15.00 | % | | 8,513 |
| 100.00 | % | 100.00 | % | 20.00 | % | | 12,055 |
|
| | | 119.20 | % | | $ | 67,626 |
| | 125.30 | % | | $ | 75,618 |
|
The First Bancorp 2015 Proxy Statement • Page 16
| | | Officer | | Percent of Base | | Amount | | Percent of Base | | Amount |
| Susan Norton | 2014 Base Salary | | | $ | 198,000 |
| 2016 Base Salary | | | $ | 210,200 |
|
| HR & Admin | 2014 Incentive Target | 25.00 | % | | $ | 49,500 |
| |
| Chief Administrative Officer | | 2016 Incentive Target | 25.00 | % | | $ | 52,550 |
|
| | 2014 Actual Payout | 32.30 | % | | $ | 63,906 |
| 2016 Actual Payout | 31.10 | % | | $ | 65,395 |
|
| Performance Measures | Threshold | Target | Stretch | | Weight | Threshold | Target | Stretch | | Weight |
| Net income | $ | 13,000,000 |
| $ | 14,000,000 |
| $ | 15,000,000 |
| | 40.00 | % | $ | 16,540 |
| $ | 17,540 |
| $ | 18,540 |
| | 20.00 | % |
| Return on Average Assets | 0.91 | % | 0.96 | % | 1.01 | % | | 15.00 | % | |
| Return on Average Equity | | 11.32 | % | 12.32 | % | 13.32 | % | | 10.00 | % |
| Efficiency Ratio | 57.86 | % | 54.86 | % | 51.86 | % | | 15.00 | % | 53.41 | % | 51.41 | % | 49.41 | % | | 10.00 | % |
| Successful Strategic Review of Health Insurance | 50.00 | % | 100.00 | % | 150.00 | % | | 15.00 | % | |
| Fee Income From Four Key Areas | | 8,581 |
| 8,881 |
| 9,181 |
| | 10.00 | % |
| Implementation of Strategic Plan | | 50.00 | % | 100.00 | % | 150.00 | % | | 15.00 | % |
| Personnel Expense to Average Assets | | 1.08 | % | 0.98 | % | 0.88 | % | | 15.00 | % |
| Discretionary | 50.00 | % | 100.00 | % | 150.00 | % | | 15.00 | % | 50.00 | % | 100.00 | % | 150.00 | % | | 20.00 | % |
| Incentive Opportunity Range | Threshold | Target | Stretch | | | Threshold | Target | Stretch | | |
| Net income | $ | 9,900 |
| $ | 19,800 |
| $ | 29,700 |
| | | $ | 5,255 |
| $ | 10,510 |
| $ | 15,765 |
| | |
| Return on Average Assets | 3,713 |
| 7,425 |
| 11,138 |
| | | |
| Return on Average Equity | | 2,628 |
| 5,255 |
| 7,883 |
| | |
| Efficiency Ratio | 3,713 |
| 7,425 |
| 11,138 |
| | | 2,628 |
| 5,255 |
| 7,883 |
| | |
| Successful Strategic Review of Health Insurance | 3,713 |
| 7,425 |
| 11,138 |
| | | |
| Fee Income From Four Key Areas | | 2,628 |
| 5,255 |
| 7,883 |
| | |
| Implementation of Strategic Plan | | 3,941 |
| 7,883 |
| 11,824 |
| | |
| Personnel Expense to Average Assets | | 3,941 |
| 7,883 |
| 11,824 |
| | |
| Discretionary | 3,713 |
| 7,425 |
| 11,138 |
| | | 5,255 |
| 10,510 |
| 15,765 |
| | |
| | $ | 24,750 |
| $ | 49,500 |
| $ | 74,250 |
| | | $ | 26,276 |
| $ | 52,551 |
| $ | 78,827 |
| | |
| Actual Achievement | Actual Performance | Payout Allocation | Weighted Payout Percent | | Actual Payout | Actual Performance | Payout Allocation | Weighted Payout Percent | | Actual Payout |
| Net income | $ | 15,072,000 |
| 150.00 | % | 60.00 | % | | $ | 29,700 |
| $ | 18,344 |
| 140.20 | % | 28.00 | % | | $ | 14,734 |
|
| Return on Average Assets | 1.04 | % | 150.00 | % | 22.50 | % | | 11,138 |
| |
| Return on Average Equity | | 12.77 | % | 122.50 | % | 12.20 | % | | 6,437 |
|
| Efficiency Ratio | 54.22 | % | 110.70 | % | 16.60 | % | | 8,219 |
| 49.53 | % | 147.00 | % | 14.70 | % | | 7,727 |
|
| Successful Strategic Review of Health Insurance | 100.00 | % | 100.00 | % | 15.00 | % | | 7,425 |
| |
| Fee Income From Four Key Areas | | 9,700 |
| 150.00 | % | 15.00 | % | | 7,883 |
|
| Implementation of Strategic Plan | | 100.00 | % | 100.00 | % | 15.00 | % | | 7,883 |
|
| Personnel Expense to Average Assets | | 0.96 | % | 109.70 | % | 16.40 | % | | 8,644 |
|
| Discretionary | 100.00 | % | 100.00 | % | 15.00 | % | | 7,425 |
| 115.00 | % | 115.00 | % | 23.00 | % | | 12,087 |
|
| | | 129.10 | % | | $ | 63,906 |
| | 124.30 | % | | $ | 65,395 |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Officer | | | Percent of Base | | Amount |
| Richard Elder | 2016 Base Salary | | | $ | 179,400 |
|
| Treasurer | 2016 Incentive Target | 25.00 | % | | $ | 44,850 |
|
| | 2016 Actual Payout | 31.90 | % | | $ | 57,181 |
|
| Performance Measures | Threshold | Target | Stretch | | Weight |
| Net income | $ | 16,540 |
| $ | 17,540 |
| $ | 18,540 |
| | 20.00 | % |
| Return on Average Equity | 11.32 | % | 12.32 | % | 13.32 | % | | 10.00 | % |
| Efficiency Ratio | 53.41 | % | 51.41 | % | 49.41 | % | | 10.00 | % |
| Fee Income From Four Key Areas | 8,581 |
| 8,881 |
| 9,181 |
| | 10.00 | % |
| Implementation of Strategic Plan | 50 | % | 100 | % | 150 | % | | 20.00 | % |
| Consumer/Residential Fee Income | 330 |
| 365 |
| 400 |
| | 10.00 | % |
| Discretionary | 50.00 | % | 100.00 | % | 150.00 | % | | 20.00 | % |
| Incentive Opportunity Range | Threshold | Target | Stretch | | |
| Net income | $ | 4,485 |
| $ | 8,970 |
| $ | 13,455 |
| | |
| Return on Average Equity | 2,243 |
| 4,485 |
| 6,728 |
| | |
| Efficiency Ratio | 2,243 |
| 4,485 |
| 6,728 |
| | |
| Fee Income From Four Key Areas | 2,243 |
| 4,485 |
| 6,728 |
| | |
| Implementation of Strategic Plan | 2,243 |
| 4,485 |
| 6,728 |
| | |
| Consumer/Residential Fee Income | 3,364 |
| 6,728 |
| 10,091 |
| | |
| Discretionary | 4,485 |
| 8,970 |
| 13,455 |
| | |
| | $ | 21,306 |
| $ | 42,608 |
| $ | 63,913 |
| | |
| Actual Achievement | Actual Performance | Payout Allocation | Weighted Payout Percent | | Actual Payout |
| Net income | $ | 18,344 |
| 140.20 | % | 28.00 | % | | $ | 12,575 |
|
| Return on Average Equity | 12.77 | % | 122.50 | % | 12.20 | % | | 5,494 |
|
| Efficiency Ratio | 49.53 | % | 147.00 | % | 14.70 | % | | 6,595 |
|
| Fee Income From Four Key Areas | 9,700 |
| 150.00 | % | 15.00 | % | | 6,728 |
|
| Implementation of Strategic Plan | 100 | % | 100.00 | % | 15.00 | % | | 6,728 |
|
| Consumer/Residential Fee Income | 458 |
| 150.00 | % | 22.50 | % | | 10,091 |
|
| Discretionary | 100.00 | % | 100.00 | % | 20.00 | % | | 8,970 |
|
| | | | 127.40 | % | | $ | 57,181 |
|
Long-Term Incentives
Stock Options and Restricted Stock Awards: In 2010, the Company’s shareholders voted to establish an equity-based long-term incentive plan which grants authority to the Board of Directors to issue stock options, restricted stock and other equity-based grants to retain and motivate existing high-performing employees and to attract new members to the Management team should the need arise. The purpose of this plan is to incentivize executives through equity ownership and align their interests with those of the Shareholders while providing mid-term and longer-term incentives tied to overall Company performance. It is among the objectives of this plan that, by having a portion of the executive’s compensation tied to the performance of the Company’s stock, the individual will be rewarded for maximizingenhancing long-term shareholder value.
The mid- to long-term outlook of this type of compensation serves as a balance to the short-term rewards of base compensation and the short-term incentive plan. Due to conservative vesting restrictions,provisions, stock options and restricted stock grants are also intendeddesigned to encourage an executive to remain with the Company. The amount of options granted reflects the executive’s position in the organization, level of responsibility, impact on the Company’s performance and actual performance in meeting individual performance goals.
The plan is administered by the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors, and in 2012, the Compensation Committee established specific long-term incentive targets for the SEOs based on position in the Company. The plan approved by shareholders implements safeguards, including clawbacks, to curtail undue
short-term risk taking. The Compensation Committee is responsible for the design and oversight for these safeguards.
For 2016 performance, grants under the long-term incentive plan were awarded by the Company’s Compensation Committee on January 26, 2017, and were based on the previous day’s closing price for the Company's common stock of $29.10 per share. All awards have cliff vesting, with Mr. Ward’s having a vesting period of one year from the date of grant, and the remaining SEOs having a vesting period of five years from date of grant. The following table summarizes the 2016 targets and actual grants to the SEOs under the long-term incentive program:
|
| | | | | | |
| For 2016 Performance | Target | Actual | Value | Shares |
| Tony C. McKim | 20.0% | 20.0% | $ | 86,000 |
| 2,955 |
| F. Stephen Ward* | 15.0% | 15.0% | $ | 38,160 |
| 1,311 |
| Charles A. Wootton | 15.0% | 15.0% | $ | 36,165 |
| 1,243 |
| Susan A. Norton | 15.0% | 15.0% | $ | 31,530 |
| 1,084 |
| Richard M. Elder | 15.0% | 15.0% | $ | 26,910 |
| 925 |
*On February 14, 2017, F. Stephen Ward was granted an additional 665 shares at $27.14 the closing price on February 13, 2017. These shares were granted based on 2016 performance.
For 2015 performance, grants under the long-term incentive plan were awarded by the Company’s Compensation Committee on January 28, 2016 and were based on the previous day’s closing price for the Company’s common stock of $18.11 per share. All awards have cliff vesting, with Mr. Ward’s having a vesting period of one year from the date of grant and the remaining SEOs having a vesting period of five years from the date of grant. The following table summarizes the 2015 targets and actual grants to the SEOs under the long-term incentive program.
|
| | | | | | | |
| For 2015 Performance | Target | Actual | Value | Shares |
| Tony C. McKim | 20.0% | 20.0% | $ | 75,000 |
| 4,141 |
|
| F. Stephen Ward | 15.0% | 20.0% | $ | 37,050 |
| 2,046 |
|
| Charles A. Wootton | 15.0% | 15.0% | $ | 35,100 |
| 1,938 |
|
| Susan A. Norton | 15.0% | 15.0% | $ | 30,605 |
| 1,690 |
|
| Richard M. Elder | 10.0% | 10.0% | $ | 26,250 |
| 1,449 |
|
For 2014 performance, grants under the long-term incentive plan were awarded by the Company’s Compensation Committee on January 29, 2015 and were based on the previous day’s closing price for the Company'sCompany’s common stock of $16.70 per share. All awards have cliff vesting, with Mr. Ward’s having a vesting period of one year from the date of grant and the remaining SEOs having a vesting period of five years from the date of grant.
The First Bancorp 2015 Proxy Statement • Page 17
The following table summarizes the 2014 targets and actual grants to the SEOs under the long-term incentive program:program.
| | | For 2014 Performance | Target | Actual | Value | Shares | Target | Actual | Value | Shares |
| Daniel R. Daigneault | 0.0% |
| $— |
| — |
| |
| Tony C. McKim | 20.0% |
| $52,083 |
| 3,119 |
| 20.0% | $ | 52,038 |
| 3,119 |
|
| F. Stephen Ward | 15.0% | 20.0% |
| $36,000 |
| 2,156 |
| 15.0% | 20.0% | $ | 36,000 |
| 2,156 |
|
| Charles A. Wootton | 15.0% |
| $34,050 |
| 2,039 |
| 15.0% | $ | 34,050 |
| 2,039 |
|
| Susan A. Norton | 15.0% |
| $29,700 |
| 1,778 |
| 15.0% | $ | 29,700 |
| 1,778 |
|
| Richard M. Elder | | 10.0% | $ | 17,000 |
| 1,018 |
|
For 2013 performance, grants under the long-term incentive plan were awarded by the Company’s Compensation Committee on February 10, 2014 and were based on the previous day’s closing price for the Company’s common stock of $16.36 per share. All awards have cliff vesting, with Mr. Daigneault’s vesting on January 2, 2015; Mr. Ward’s having a vesting period of two years from the date of grant and the remaining SEOs having a vesting period of five years from the date of grant. The following table summarizes the 2013 targets and actual grants under the long-term incentive plan:
|
| | | | |
| For 2013 Performance | Target | Actual | Value | Shares |
| Daniel R. Daigneault | 20.0% | 20.0% | $83,200 | 5,086 |
| F. Stephen Ward | 15.0% | 22.5% | $52,875 | 3,232 |
| Tony C. McKim | 15.0% | 15.0% | $35,250 | 2,155 |
| Charles A. Wootton | 15.0% | 15.0% | $33,300 | 2,035 |
| Susan A. Norton | 15.0% | 15.0% | $28,800 | 1,760 |
For 2012 performance, grants under the long-term incentive plan were awarded by the Company’s Compensation Committee on January 23, 2013, and were based on the previous day’s closing price for the Company's common stock of $16.73 per share. All awards have cliff vesting, with Mr. Daigneault’s vesting on January 2, 2015, Mr. Ward’s having a vesting period of three years from the date of grant, and the remaining SEOs having a vesting period of five years from date of grant. The following table summarizes the 2012 targets and actual grants to the SEOs under the long-term incentive plan:
|
| | | | |
| For 2012 Performance | Target | Actual | Value | Shares |
| Daniel R. Daigneault | 20.0% | 20.0% | $80,800 | 4,830 |
| F. Stephen Ward | 15.0% | 15.0% | $34,050 | 2,035 |
| Tony C. McKim | 15.0% | 15.0% | $34,050 | 2,035 |
| Charles A. Wootton | 15.0% | 15.0% | $32,250 | 1,928 |
| Susan A. Norton | 15.0% | 15.0% | $28,750 | 1,659 |
In addition to the above grants related to 2012 compensation, on March 1, 2012, the Compensation Committee made awards to the SEOs under the 2010 plan that were related to but not in conjunction with 2011 performance. As such, they were included in 2012 compensation. These awards were made as follows: Mr. Daigneault received a grant of 2,027 shares that vested on January 2, 2015. Mr. Ward received a grant of 2,704 shares which vest on the third anniversary of the grant date. Messrs. McKim, and Wootton and Ms. Norton received grants of 2,149 shares, 2,077 shares and 1,705 shares, respectively, with cliff vesting on the fifth anniversary of the grant. Grants to other executives totaled 2,065 shares under the same five-year cliff vesting.
The Board of Directors is required to make appropriate adjustments in connection with the 2010 Plan and any outstanding awards to reflect stock dividends, stock splits and certain other events. In the event of a merger, liquidation or other reorganization event, as defined in the 2010 Plan, the Board of Directors is authorized to provide for outstanding options or other stock-based awards to be assumed or substituted for, and, if the acquiring or succeeding corporation does not agree to assume or substitute for, such awards, the Board of
Directors is authorized to provide for the acceleration of any award, and, if applicable, to make an award fully exercisable prior to consummation of the reorganization event or to provide for a cash out of the value of any
The First Bancorp 2015 Proxy Statement • Page 18
outstanding options. Upon the occurrence of a reorganization event, the repurchase and other rights of the Company under each outstanding award shall inure to the benefit of the Company’s successor and shall apply to the cash, securities or other property which the Common Stock was converted into or exchanged for pursuant to such reorganization event in the same manner and to the same extent as they applied to the Common Stock subject to such restricted stock award. The 1995 stock option plan expired in April 2005. Prior to the expiration date, all of the options available under the plan were granted, with the last awards being made in January 2005.
Stock Ownership Guidelines
On October 17, 2012, the Compensation Committee voted to establish ownership guidelines applicable to Directors, SeniorNamed Executive Officers, and other executives as recommended by the President and CEO and approved by the CompensationsCompensation Committee. Executives and Directors will beare expected to maintain the ownership (by Company grant and individual ownership) of at least the following amounts of the Company's stock:
|
| |
| Participant | Required Value or Number of Shares |
| Directors | 5,000 Shares |
| President and CEO | 2x Base Salary |
Senior Executive Officers (SEOs)(SEO) | 1x Base Salary |
As of December 31, 2014,2016, all current Directors and SEOs met the above stock ownership guidelines except for Mr.Directors Kelly and Russell. Until the ownership guideline is met,achieved, 75% of the net after taxes ofMs. Kelly's and Mr. Russell's Director'sdirectors' fees will be paid in the Company's Stock.Company stock. The Company has no policies with regard to hedging activities related to shares owned under the above guidelines.
Compensation Mix
With assistance from Pearl Meyer, & Partners, the Compensation Committee believes that the Company has developed an appropriate mix of base pay, short-term incentives and long-term incentives for the Senior Executive Officers. Utilizing the 2010 Equity Incentive Plan, the Compensation Committee reviews the mix and determines how long-term incentives fit with total compensation. The Committee’s expectation is that long-term incentives will constitute 10% to 25% of total compensation depending on the executive and his or her position in the Company. In addition to the long-term incentive plan, the short termshort-term incentive plan approved by the Board in 2012 provides for short-term incentives that could also constitute 10% to 25% of total compensation depending on the executive, his or her position in the Company and the executive’s job performance in the prior year. With the addition of the short-term and long-term incentive programs, base compensation should constitute 50% to 80% of total pay depending on the executive, his or her position and individual achievement in relation to his or her goals. These percentages are based on industry averages and best practices.
Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan:Plan: The Company also sponsors an unfunded, non-qualified supplemental retirement plan established in 1997 for certain Executive Officers. The plan provides supplemental retirement benefits payable in installments over 20 years, commencing upon retirement or death. The costs for this plan are recognized over the service lives of the participating Executive Officers. As of December 31, 2014,2016, only twoone active executives (CEO Daigneault and CFOexecutive (CFO Ward) were participantswas a participant in the plan. As originally adopted, the plan provides a projected retirement benefit for Mr. Daigneault, assuming he remains employed by the Bank until normal retirement age of 65, of $169,329 per year, with such payments beginning in the year 2017. The projected retirement benefit for Mr. Ward assuming he remains employed by the Bank until normal retirement age of 65, is $61,127 per year, with such payments beginning in the year 2018. The benefits arebenefit is capped at the above amounts.amount. On December 30, 2008, the Company amended the plans to change the normal retirement age to receive the full benefit under the Plan from age 65 to age 63. The date on which the Executive Officer may begin to collect the retirement benefit payments doesdid not change, however, and remains January 1 of the year in which the Executive Officer turns age 65. The plan also contains a restrictive covenant that may result in the
The First Bancorp 2015 Proxy Statement • Page 19
Executive Officer forfeiting all accrued benefits should he accept employment with a
competing financial institution within five years after his termination of employment with the Company.
Other Benefits
401(k) and Other Benefits: The Company’s primary retirement plan is the 401(k) Plan. It is available to any employee who has attained the age of 21 and completed six months of continuous service. The Company typically provides a match at 50% of employee deferrals to the extent that the deferral does not exceed 6% of eligible compensation. In addition, an annual discretionary component may typically be paid. The Board makes a determination at the end of each fiscal year as to what, if any, amount is to be paid based on the financial performance of the Company for that year. In 20142016, 2015 and 2013,2014, this discretionary amount was 2.0% of base salary for all eligible employees. Employee contributions are 100% vested at all times, while employer contributions are vested over a five-year period. Upon termination of employment for any reason, a plan participant may receive his or her contribution account and earnings allocated to it, as well as the vested portion of his or her employer-matching account and earnings allocated to it. Non-vested amounts are forfeited and are used by the Company to help defray plan administration expenses.
Stock Purchase Plan: The Company has a stock purchase plan available to all employees and Directors that provides an opportunity to purchase shares through payroll deduction. Directors may elect to have up to 100% of their fees placed in the stock purchase plan. The purchase price is at the fair market value of the shares without a commission as determined by the NASDAQ closing price on the day the shares are purchased.
Severance and Change of Control Benefits: The Company does not have any employment agreements with any of the executives of the Company. The Company also does not have a severance program for employees and executives, except for Mr. McKim, who entered into an agreement in 2000 while employed by FNB Bankshares which expired on January 9, 2015. For the twoone active executivesexecutive covered under the SERP, being CEO Daigneault and CFO Ward, theirhis defined benefits under the SERP shall become fully vested upon a change of control.
Company Vehicle:Vehicle: Senior executives are provided mileage reimbursement for business travel when using their own vehicles. For certain named Executive Officers, a Company-owned vehicle may be provided subject to approval of the Compensation Committee. The non-business use of the vehicle is taxable income to the executive and is included as part of the executive’s total compensation. In 2014,2016 the fourthree executives with Company-provided vehicles were CEO Daigneault,McKim, CFO Ward, EVP McKim and EVP Wootton.
Bank-Owned Life Insurance: The Company may purchase a single-premium life insurance policy on the life of an executive with a split dollar benefit between the Company and the executive’s estate. The Company believes that Bank Owned Life Insurance is a good investment option for the Company and also provides key man protection upon the untimely death of a senior executive. The cash surrender value is an asset of the Company.
Supplemental Long Term Disability Insurance:Insurance: In 2010, the Company purchased supplemental long-term disability insurance policies for the five most highly compensated executives. Four of those executives remain with the Company and are covered by this policy. This insurance was purchased as a group policy through Union Central Insurance and is intended to assist with any shortfalls that may exist due to the insurance caps applicable to the Company’sCompany's overall group policy.
The First Bancorp 2015 Proxy Statement • Page 20
Compensation of Chief Executive Officer and Other SEOs
Base Salary
As noted previously, the Compensation Committee has established targets for Base Pay at just above the market median (55th to 75th percentile) of the Company’s peer group, established by Pearl Meyer, & Partners, and each executive’s actual base pay will reflect the executive’s role, experience and contribution to the Company. CEO Daigneault’s 2013 baseMcKim was appointed President of the Bank in 2014 and he assumed the title of CEO of the Company on January 5, 2015. His salary of $416,000for 2016 was set at $430,000 which placed him atin the 55th45th percentile for the peer group. Based uponAs noted above, the comprehensive reviews and comparative assessments for all SEOs performedCompensation Committee will use the data provided by Pearl Meyer & Partners, and various other factors, including a review of responsibilities, experience2016 operating results after Mr. McKim’s first year in their roles, overall performance, and a review of the various components of compensation providedoffice, to move his base salary to the individual executive,target level desired by the Committee and what is outlined in fiscal 2014 CEO Daigneault’s base salary was set at an annual rate of $425,000. This represents a $9,000 or 2.16% increase above his 2013 base salaryour compensation philosophy and placed him at the 50th percentile for the peer group.strategy.
The Compensation Committee’s decisions related to 20142016 base salaries were based on 20132015 operating results. The Bank continued to outperform its national peer group in many areas –- as measured by the Uniform Bank Performance Report. These included return on average assets, return on average equity, the efficiency ratio, and asset quality ratios. Building and strengthening the Company’s capital is a priority, and in 20142016 the Company’s regulatory capital ratios remained strong. The Board and Management place a high value on building shareholder value, and the $0.20$0.22 per share quarterly dividend was increased to $0.21$0.23 per share in the second quarter of 2014.2016. During the fourth quarter of 2016, the Company also declared a special cash dividend of $0.12 per share. Additional detail on the Company’s performance is further detailed in Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations in its Annual Report on Form 10-K.
Stock Grants/Long-Term Incentives
As noted above, in 2012, the Compensation Committee established specific long-term incentive targets for the SEOs based on position in the Company for grants to be made under the Equity Incentive Plan approved by stockholders in 2010. Grants for 2016 performance under the Long-Term Incentive Program were awarded on January 26, 2017 and based on the previous day’s closing price for the Company’s common stock of $29.10 per share. All awards have cliff vesting, with Mr. Ward’s vesting one year from the date of grant, and the
remaining SEOs' vesting five years from the date of grant. The details of these grants can be found on page 21.
Grants for 2015 performance under the Long-Term Incentive Program were awarded on January 28, 2016 and based on the previous day’s closing price for the Company's common stock of $18.11 per share. All awards have cliff vesting, with Mr. Ward’s vesting one year from the date of grant, and the remaining SEOs vesting five years from date of grant. The details of these grants can be found on page 21.
Grants for 2014 performance under the Long-Term Incentive Program were awarded on January 29, 2015 and based on the previous day’s closing price for the Company's common stock of $16.70 per share. All awards have cliff vesting, with Mr. Ward’s vesting one year from the date of grant, and the remaining SEOs vesting five years from date of grant. The details of these grants can be found on page 18.21.
Grants for 2013 performance under the Long-Term Incentive Program were awarded on February 10, 2014 and based on the previous day’s closing price for the Company's common stock of $16.36 per share. All awards have cliff vesting, with Mr. Daigneault’s vesting on January 2, 2015, Mr. Ward’s vesting two years from the date of grant, and the remaining SEOs vesting five years from date of grant. The details of these grants can be found on page 18.
Grants for 2012 performance were awarded by the Company’s Compensation Committee on January 23, 2013, and were based on the previous day’s closing price for the Company's common stock of $16.73 per share. All awards have cliff vesting, with Mr. Daigneault’s vesting on January 2, 2015, Mr. Ward’s vesting three years from the date of grant, and the remaining SEOs vesting five years from date of grant. The details of these grants can be found on page 18. In addition to these grants related to 2012 compensation, earlier in 2012 awards were made by the Compensation Committee under the plan that were related to but not in conjunction with 2011 performance. As such, they were included in 2012 compensation. These awards were as follows: Mr. Daigneault received a grant of 2,027 shares that vest on January 2, 2015. Mr. Ward received a grant of 2,704 shares which vest four years from date of grant. Messrs. McKim, and Wootton and Ms. Norton received grants of 2,149 shares, 2,077 shares and 1,705 shares, respectively, with cliff vesting on the fifth anniversary of the grant.
Other Compensation
In 2014,2016, there were no additional compensation items other than those detailed in the table below for CEO Daigneault,McKim, CFO Ward, EVP McKim,Wootton, EVP WoottonNorton and EVP Norton.Elder. The change in pension value and non-qualifiednon- qualified retirement plan earnings for CEO Daigneault and CFO Ward representrepresents the required accounting accruals under the Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan and dodoes not constitute a cash payments.payment.
The First Bancorp 2015 Proxy Statement • Page 21
Executive Compensation
The following Summary Compensation Table sets forth the cash and non-cash compensation for each of the last three fiscal years earned by the Principal Executive Officer, the Principal Financial Officer as well as the three other highest paid active Executive Officers in fiscal 2014.2016.
| | Name and
Principal Position | Year | Salary
($) | Short-Term Bonus1 ($) | Stock Awards ($) | Change in Pension Value and Non-Qualified Deferred Compensation Earnings2
($) | All Other Compensation3 ($) | Total
($) | Year | Salary
($) | Short-Term Bonus ($) | Stock Awards ($) | Change in Pension Value and Non-Qualified Deferred Compensation Earnings1
($) | All Other Compensation2 ($) | Total
($) |
| Daniel R. Daigneault | 2014 | 425,000 |
| 166,044 |
| — |
| 597,099 |
| 17,929 |
| 1,206,072 |
| |
| Tony C. McKim | | 2016 | 430,000 |
| 187,039 |
| 86,000 |
| — |
| 15,857 |
| 718,896 |
|
| President | 2013 | 416,000 |
| 82,037 |
| 124,897 |
| 213,306 |
| 17,654 |
| 853,894 |
| 2015 | 375,000 |
| 150,000 |
| 75,000 |
| — |
| 15,609 |
| 615,609 |
|
| Principal Executive Officer | 2012 | 404,000 |
| — |
| 173,112 |
| 196,805 |
| 17,558 |
| 791,475 |
| |
| Tony C. McKim | 2014 | 260,415 |
| 87,655 |
| 52,083 |
| — |
| 15,349 |
| 415,502 |
| |
| Executive Vice President | 2013 | 235,000 |
| 38,562 |
| 54,850 |
| — |
| 14,125 |
| 342,537 |
| |
| Chief Operating Officer | 2012 | 227,000 |
| — |
| 97,415 |
| — |
| 13,795 |
| 338,210 |
| |
| F. Stephen Ward | 2014 | 240,000 |
| 80,783 |
| 36,000 |
| 76,542 |
| 14,256 |
| 447,581 |
| |
| Chief Executive Officer | | 2014 | 260,415 |
| 87,655 |
| 52,038 |
| — |
| 15,349 |
| 415,457 |
|
F. Stephen Ward3 | | 2016 | 254,400 |
| 82,993 |
| 56,208 |
| 80,938 |
| 15,125 |
| 489,664 |
|
| Executive Vice President | 2013 | 235,000 |
| 42,050 |
| 74,248 |
| 66,526 |
| 13,597 |
| 431,421 |
| 2015 | 247,000 |
| 77,033 |
| 37,050 |
| 78,561 |
| 15,125 |
| 454,769 |
|
| Principal Financial Officer | 2012 | 227,000 |
| — |
| 104,268 |
| 61,248 |
| 13,169 |
| 405,685 |
| 2014 | 240,000 |
| 80,783 |
| 36,000 |
| 76,542 |
| 14,256 |
| 447,581 |
|
| Charles A. Wootton | 2014 | 227,000 |
| 67,626 |
| 34,050 |
| — |
| 16,328 |
| 345,004 |
| 2016 | 241,100 |
| 75,618 |
| 36,165 |
| — |
| 17,725 |
| 370,608 |
|
| Executive Vice President | 2013 | 222,000 |
| 35,674 |
| 51,432 |
| — |
| 16,820 |
| 325,926 |
| 2015 | 234,000 |
| 75,572 |
| 35,100 |
| — |
| 14,920 |
| 359,592 |
|
| Senior Loan Officer | 2012 | 215,000 |
| — |
| 92,035 |
| — |
| 17,694 |
| 324,729 |
| 2014 | 227,000 |
| 67,626 |
| 34,050 |
| — |
| 16,328 |
| 345,004 |
|
| Susan A. Norton | 2014 | 198,000 |
| 63,906 |
| 29,700 |
| — |
| 11,417 |
| 303,023 |
| 2016 | 210,200 |
| 65,393 |
| 31,530 |
| — |
| 13,485 |
| 320,608 |
|
| Executive Vice President | 2013 | 192,000 |
| 30,306 |
| 44,203 |
| — |
| 9,600 |
| 276,109 |
| 2015 | 204,000 |
| 60,379 |
| 30,600 |
| — |
| 13,250 |
| 308,229 |
|
| Human Resources/ Compliance | 2012 | 185,000 |
| — |
| 78,509 |
| — |
| 9,250 |
| 272,759 |
| |
| Chief Administrative Officer | | 2014 | 198,000 |
| 63,906 |
| 29,700 |
| — |
| 11,417 |
| 303,023 |
|
| Richard M. Elder | | 2016 | 179,400 |
| 57,180 |
| 26,910 |
| — |
| 11,873 |
| 275,363 |
|
| Executive Vice President | | 2015 | 175,000 |
| 55,007 |
| 26,250 |
| — |
| 10,243 |
| 266,500 |
|
| Treasurer | | 2014 | 170,000 |
| 29,849 |
| 17,000 |
| — |
| 10,093 |
| 226,942 |
|
| |
1 | In 2012, because of the bank’s participation in the CPP program, the above-named executive officers were not eligible for a short-term cash bonus. |
| |
2
| The amount shown represents the change in accrued liability in each of the years listed for the Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan detailed in the Pension Table. |
32 All Other Compensation is detailed in the table below and includes the following:
401(k) Matching and Profit Sharing Contributions. In all years, the Company provided a match at 50% of employee deferrals to the extent that the deferral does not exceed 6% of eligible compensation. The Company also provides a discretionary contribution to employees who have been employed one year or more. This was 2.0% of base salary in 2014, 20132016, 2015 and 2012.2014. All 401(k) match and profit sharing contributions are subject to the IRS regulations that govern the maximum amount of an Officer’s earnings which are eligible to be considered for the match and profit share components of compensation.
Company-Owned Vehicle. The amounts shown representinclude the value of personal use for Company-Owned vehicles by the Named Executives.Executives, where applicable.
Economic Value of Life Insurance. This representsThe amounts shown include the value of the Named Executives’ portion of policies provided by Life Insurance Endorsement Split Dollar Plan agreement for Bank Owned Life Insurance.
3 CFO Ward was granted stock valued at $38,160 under the LTI plan. He was also granted an additional 665 shares on February 14, 2017 based on the closing price on February 13, 2017 of $27.14. These shares were granted based on his performance in 2016.
The First Bancorp 2015 Proxy Statement • Page 22
| | | Name and Principal Position | Year | 401k Matching Contribution ($) | 401k
Profit-Sharing Contribution
($) | Company-Owned Vehicle
($) | Economic Value of Life Insurance
($) | Year | 401k Matching Contribution ($) | 401k
Profit-Sharing Contribution
($) | Company-Owned Vehicle
($) | Economic Value of Life Insurance
($) |
| Daniel R. Daigneault | 2014 | 7,800 |
| 5,200 |
| 4,025 |
| 904 |
| |
| President | 2013 | 7,650 |
| 5,100 |
| 4,025 |
| 879 |
| |
| Principal Executive Officer | 2012 | 7,500 |
| 5,000 |
| 4,209 |
| 849 |
| |
| Tony C. McKim | 2014 | 7,800 |
| 5,200 |
| 2,204 |
| 145 |
| 2016 | 7,950 |
| 5,300 |
| 2,204 |
| 403 |
|
| Executive Vice President | 2013 | 7,050 |
| 4,713 |
| 2,204 |
| 158 |
| 2015 | 7,950 |
| 5,300 |
| 2,204 |
| 155 |
|
| Chief Operating Officer | 2012 | 6,810 |
| 4,540 |
| 2,300 |
| 145 |
| |
| Chief Executive Officer | | 2014 | 7,800 |
| 5,200 |
| 2,204 |
| 145 |
|
| F. Stephen Ward | 2014 | 7,200 |
| 5,200 |
| 1,215 |
| 641 |
| 2016 | 7,632 |
| 5,300 |
| 1,215 |
| 695 |
|
| Executive Vice President | 2013 | 7,050 |
| 4,713 |
| 1,215 |
| 619 |
| 2015 | 7,950 |
| 5,300 |
| 1,215 |
| 660 |
|
| Principal Financial Officer | 2012 | 6,810 |
| 4,540 |
| 1,215 |
| 604 |
| 2014 | 7,200 |
| 5,200 |
| 1,215 |
| 641 |
|
| Charles A. Wootton | 2014 | 7,800 |
| 5,200 |
| 3,328 |
| — |
| 2016 | 7,232 |
| 5,300 |
| 4,810 |
| 383 |
|
| Executive Vice President | 2013 | 6,660 |
| 4,440 |
| 5,720 |
| — |
| 2015 | 7,020 |
| 5,300 |
| 2,600 |
| — |
|
| Senior Loan Officer | 2012 | 6,450 |
| 4,300 |
| 6,944 |
| — |
| 2014 | 7,800 |
| 5,200 |
| 3,328 |
| — |
|
| Susan A. Norton | 2014 | 6,850 |
| 4,567 |
| — |
| — |
| 2016 | 7,950 |
| 5,300 |
| — |
| 235 |
|
| Executive Vice President | 2013 | 5,760 |
| 3,840 |
| — |
| — |
| 2015 | 7,950 |
| 5,300 |
| — |
| — |
|
| Human Resources/ Compliance | 2012 | 5,550 |
| 3,700 |
| — |
| — |
| 2014 | 6,850 |
| 4,567 |
| — |
| — |
|
| Richard M. Elder | | 2016 | 7,032 |
| 4,688 |
| — |
| 153 |
|
| Executive Vice President | | 2015 | 6,146 |
| 4,097 |
| — |
| — |
|
| Retail Lending | | 2014 | 6,056 |
| 4,037 |
| — |
| — |
|
Stock-Based Compensation
On December 15, 1994, the Company’s Board of Directors adopted a Stock Option Plan (the “Option Plan”) for the benefit of officers and other full-time employees of the Company and the Bank. This plan was approved by the Company’s Shareholders at the 1995 Annual Meeting. Under the Option Plan, 600,000 shares (subject to adjustment to reflect stock splits and similar events) are reserved from the authorized but unissued Common Stock of the Company for future issuance by the Company for exercise of stock options granted to certain key employees of the Company and the Bank from time to time. The purpose of the Option Plan is to encourage the retention of such key employees by facilitating their purchase of a stock interest in the Company. The Option Plan is intended to provide for the granting of incentive stock options under Section 422 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the “Code”) to employees of the Company or the Bank.
The Option Plan is administered by the Compensation Committee of the Company’s Board of Directors, which is comprised solely of Directors who are ineligible to receive grants of stock options under the Option Plan and who have not received grants of options within the 12 months preceding their appointment to the Compensation Committee. The Compensation Committee selects the employees of the Bank and the Company to whom options are to be granted and designates the number of options to be granted. The Option Plan may be amended only by the vote of the holders of a majority of the Company’s outstanding Common Stock if such amendment would increase the number of shares available for issuance under the Option Plan, change the eligibility criteria for grants of options under the Option Plan, change the minimum option exercise price or increase the maximum term of options. Other amendments may be effected by the Compensation Committee.
Employees selected by the Compensation Committee receive, at no cost, options under the Option Plan. The option exercise prices are equal to or exceed the fair market value of the shares on the date of the grant, and no option is exercisable after the expiration of ten years from the date it is granted. The fair market value of the shares is determined by the Compensation Committee as specified in the Option Plan. The optionee cannot transfer or assign any option other than by will or in accordance with the laws of descent and distribution, and the option may be exercised only by the employee during the employee’s lifetime. After an employee’s death, options may be exercised by the employee’s estate or heirs up to one year following the date of death. Code Section 422 limits option grants by providing that during the term of the Option Plan, no grant may be made to any employee owning more than 10% of the Company’s outstanding shares unless the exercise price is at least
The First Bancorp 2015 Proxy Statement • Page 23
110% of the underlying shares’ fair market value and such option is not exercisable more than five years following the option grant. The aggregate fair market value of the stock for which any employee may be granted incentive stock options which are first exercisable in any calendar year may generally not exceed $100,000.
While generally no options may be exercisable before the second anniversary of the grant date, in the event of a change in control involving the Company, all options (other than those held by Officers or Directors of the Company or the Bank for less than six months) shall become immediately exercisable. Also, an employee whose employment is terminated in connection with or within two years after such a change in control event shall be entitled to exercise all options for up to three months following the date of termination; provided that options held by officers or Directors shall not be exercisable until six months after the grant date. Employees whose services are terminated, other than following a change in control as described above, shall thereupon forfeit any options held; provided, however, that following termination due to disability an employee shall be entitled to exercise options for up to one year (provided, further, that officers may exercise only with respect to options held for at least six months).
The Company receives no monetary consideration for the granting of incentive stock options. Upon exercise, the Company receives a cash payment from optionees in exchange for shares issued. No federal income tax consequences are incurred by the Company at the time incentive stock options are granted or exercised, unless the optionee incurs liability for ordinary income tax treatment upon exercise of the option, as discussed below, in which event the Company would be entitled to a deduction equal to the optionee’s ordinary income attributable to the options. Provided the employee holds the shares received on exercise of a stock option for the longer of two years after the option was granted or one year after it was exercised, the optionee will realize capital gains income (or loss) in the year of sale in an amount equal to the difference between the sale price and the option exercise price paid for shares. If the employee sells the shares prior to the expiration of the period, the employee realizes ordinary income in the year of disposition equal to the difference between the fair market value of the shares on the date of exercise and the exercise price and capital gains income (or loss) equal to the difference (if any) between the sale price of the shares and the fair market value of the shares on the date of exercise. In addition to the tax consequences discussed above, the excess of the option price over the fair market value of the optioned stock at the time of option exercise is required to be treated by an incentive optionee as an item of tax preference for purposes of the alternative minimum tax.
At the 2010 Annual Meeting, shareholders approved the 2010 Equity Incentive Plan (the “2010 Plan”). This plan reserved 400,000 shares of Common Stock for issuance in connection with stock options, restricted stock awards and other equity based awards to attract and retain the best available personnel, provide additional incentive to officers, employees and non-employee Directors and promote the success of our business. Such grants and awards will be structured in a manner that does not encourage the recipients to expose the Company to undue or inappropriate risk. Options issued under the 2010 Plan will qualify for treatment as incentive stock options for purposes of Section 422 of the Internal Revenue Code. Other compensation under the 2010 Plan will qualify as performance-based for purposes of Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code, and will satisfy NASDAQ guidelines relating to equity compensation.
In 2012, awards of 12,727 shares of restricted stock were made under the 2010 Plan that were related to but not in conjunction with 2011 performance. These included 10,662 shares to the five SEOs as detailed in the table below and 2,065 shares to other executives. All of the shares have cliff vesting on the fifth anniversary of the grant except for President Daigneault’s, which vested on January 2, 2015, and EVP Ward’s, which vest on the fourth anniversary of the grant date.
In 2013, awards of 27,114 shares of restricted stock were made under the 2010 Plan representing both Long- and Short-Term Incentives based on 2012 performance. These included 23,037 shares to the five SEOs as detailed in the table below and 4,077 shares to other executives. All of the shares have cliff vesting on the fifth anniversary of the grant except for President Daigneault’s, which vested on January 2, 2015, and EVP Ward’s, which vest on the third anniversary of the grant date.
In 2014, awards of 25,843 shares of restricted stock were made under the 2010 Plan representing both Long- and Short-Term Incentives based on 2013 performance. These included 21,37114,745 shares to the five SEOs as detailed in the table below and 4,47211,098 shares to other executives. All of the shares have cliff vesting on the fifth
The First Bancorp 2015 Proxy Statement • Page 24
anniversary of the grant except for President Daigneault's,EVP Ward’s, which vestedvest on January 2,the second anniversary of the grant date.
In 2015, awards of 13,652 shares of restricted stock were made under the 2010 Plan representing Long-Term Incentives based on 2014 performance. These awards included 10,110 shares to the five SEOs and 3,542 to other executives. All of the shares have cliff vesting on the fifth anniversary of the grant except for EVP Ward’s, which vest on the first anniversary of the grant date. In addition, an award of 527 shares was made in 2015 as a retention incentive to a non-SEO.
The following table listsIn 2016, awards of 17,061 shares of restricted stock were made under the number of2010 Plan representing Long Term Incentives based on 2015 performance. These awards included 11,264 shares and grant-date fair value of plan-based awards made to the five SEOs as detailed in 2014:the table below and 5,797 to other executives. All of the shares have cliff vesting on the fifth anniversary of the grant except for EVP Ward's shares, which vest on the first anniversary of the grant date. In addition, awards of 4,786 shares were made in 2016 to a group of Mortgage Loan Officers based on 2015 performance.
| | Grants of Plan-Based Awards for 20141 | |
Grants of Plan-Based Awards for 20161 | | Grants of Plan-Based Awards for 20161 |
| Name | Grant Date | All Other Stock Awards: Number of Shares of Stocks or Units | All Other Option Awards: Number of Securities Underlying Options | Exercise or Base Price of Option Awards | Grant Date Fair Value of Stock and Option Awards | Grant Date | All Other Stock Awards: Number of Shares of Stocks or Units | All Other Option Awards: Number of Securities Underlying Options | Exercise or Base Price of Option Awards | Grant Date Fair Value of Stock and Option Awards |
| | | (#) | ($/Sh) | ($) | | (#) | ($/Sh) | ($) |
| Daniel R Daigneault | 2/10/2014 | 7,635 | - |
| $124,899 |
| |
| Tony C. McKim | 2/10/2014 | 3,353 | - |
| $54,851 |
| 1/28/2016 | 4,141 | - | 75,000 |
|
| F. Stephen Ward | 2/10/2014 | 4,538 | - |
| $74,249 |
| 1/28/2016 | 2,046 | - | 37,050 |
|
| Charles A. Wootton | 2/10/2014 | 3,143 | - |
| $51,433 |
| 1/28/2016 | 1,938 | - | 35,100 |
|
| Susan A. Norton | 2/10/2014 | 2,702 | - |
| $44,204 |
| 1/28/2016 | 1,690 | - | 30,600 |
|
| Richard M. Elder | | 1/28/2016 | 1,449 | - | - | 26,250 |
|
1 The numbernumbers of shares in this table doesdo not include awards made on January 29, 2015,26, 2017, which are disclosed in previous tables and considered part of 20142016 compensation.
The following table of Outstanding Equity Awards at Fiscal Year End presents all options granted to the five SEOs that were unexercised as of December 31, 20142016 and all outstanding stock awards as of the same date:
| | | | Options Awards | Stock Awards1 | Option Awards | Stock Awards1 |
| Name | Number of Securities Underlying Unexercised Options Exercisable (#) | Number of Securities Underlying Unexercised Options Unexercisable (#) | Option Exercise Price ($) | Option Expiration Date2 | Number of Shares of Stock That Have Not Vested (#) | Market Value of Shares of Stock That Have Not Vested ($) | Number of Securities Underlying Unexercised Options Exercisable | Number of Securities Underlying Unexercised Options Unexercisable
| Option Exercise Price
| Option Expiration Date | Number of Shares of Stock That Have Not Vested | Market Value of Shares of Stock That Have Not Vested |
| Daniel R Daigneault | 15,000 | - |
| $18.00 |
| 1/18/2015 | 19,692 |
| $356,228 |
| |
| | | (#) | (#) | ($) | | (#) | ($) |
| Tony C. McKim | - | - | - |
| - | 10,398 |
| $188,100 |
| - | - | - | - | 15,460 | 511,726 |
|
| F. Stephen Ward | 5,000 | - |
| $18.00 |
| 1/18/2015 | 12,050 |
| $217,985 |
| - | - | - | 2,046 | 67,723 |
|
| Charles A. Wootton | 10,000 | - |
| $18.00 |
| 1/18/2015 | 9,859 |
| $178,349 |
| - | - | - | 11,728 | 388,197 |
|
| Susan A. Norton | 6,000 | - |
| $18.00 |
| 1/18/2015 | 8,571 |
| $155,049 |
| - | - | - | 10,097 | 334,211 |
|
| Richard M. Elder | | - | - | - | 4,905 | 162,356 |
|
1 The numbernumbers of shares in this table doesdo not include awards made on January 29, 2015,26, 2017, which are disclosed in previous tables and considered part of 20142016 compensation.
2 The options expired unexercised on January 18, 2015.
The First Bancorp 2015 Proxy Statement • Page 25
The following table of Options Exercised and Stock Vested presents the options exercised by namedNamed Executive Officers in 2014.2016. The value realized on exercise is calculated by multiplying the number of shares acquired on exercise by the closing value per share on the day of exercise less the exercise cost per share. The Company had no outstanding stock awards which vested in the years presented.
|
| | | | |
| Option Awards | Stock Awards |
Name | Number of Shares Acquired on Exercise | Value Realized on Exercise | Number of Shares Acquired on Vesting (#) | Value
Realized on Vesting ($) |
Daniel R. Daigneault | - | - | - | - |
Tony C. McKim | - | - | - | - |
F. Stephen Ward | - | - | - | - |
Charles A. Wootton | - | - | - | - |
Susan A. Norton | - | - | - | - |
|
| | | | | | |
| | Option Awards | Stock Awards |
| Name | Number of Shares Acquired on Exercise | Value Realized on Exercise | Number of Shares Acquired on Vesting (#) | Value
Realized on Vesting ($) |
| Tony C. McKim | - | - | 2,198 |
| 41,095 |
|
| F. Stephen Ward | - | - | 14,206 |
| 266,082 |
|
| Charles A. Wootton | - | - | 2,108 |
| 39,424 |
|
| Susan A. Norton | - | - | 1,942 |
| 36,344 |
|
| Richard M. Elder | - | - | 500 |
| 9,430 |
|
The following table summarizes the Company’s Stock Option Plan as of December 31, 2014:2016:
|
| | | |
| Plan category | Number of securities to be issued upon exercise of outstanding options, warrants and rights | Weighted-average exercise price of outstanding options, warrants and rights | Number of securities remaining available for future issuance under equity compensation plans 1 |
Equity compensation plans approved by security holders | 42,000 | $18.00 | 327,316 |
Equity compensation plans not approved by security holders | n/a | n/a | n/a |
| Total | 42,000 | $18.00 | 327,316 |
|
| | | |
| Plan category | Number of securities to be issued upon exercise of outstanding options, warrants and rights | Weighted-average exercise price of outstanding options, warrants and rights | Number of securities remaining available for future issuance under equity compensation plans 1 |
Equity compensation plans approved by security holders | - | - | 291,290 |
Equity compensation plans not approved by security holders | n/a | n/a | n/a |
| Total | - | - | 291,290 |
1 The number of shares in this table dodoes not include awards made on January 29, 2015,26, 2017, which are disclosed in previous tables and considered part of 20142016 compensation.
Pension Plan
Although the 401(k) Plan is the Company’s primary retirement plan, the Company also sponsors an unfunded, non-qualified supplemental retirement plan for certainone Executive Officers.Officer. The plan provides supplemental retirementretire-ment benefits payable in installments over 20 years upon retirement or death. The costs for this plan are recognized over the service lives of the participating Executive Officers. The projected retirement benefit for Mr. Daigneault, is $169,329 per year, with such payments beginning in the year 2017. The projected retirement benefit for Mr. Ward assuming he remains employed by the Company until normal retirement age of 63, is $61,127 per year, with such payments beginning in the year 2018. The benefits are capped at the above amounts. On December 30, 2008, the Company amended the plansplan to change the normal retirement age to receive the full benefit under the Plan from age 65 to age 63. The date on which the Executive Officer may begin to collect the retirement benefit payments does not change, however, and remains January 1 of the year in which the Executive Officer turns age 65. The Plan also contains a restrictive covenant that may result in the Executive Officer forfeiting all accrued benefits should he accept employment with a competing financial institution within five years after his termination of employment with the Company.
The First Bancorp 2015 Proxy Statement • Page 26
The following table of Pension Benefits shows the present value of accumulated benefits for the named Executive OfficersOfficer as of December 31, 2014:2016.
| | Name
| Plan Name
| Number of Years Credited Service
| Present Value of Accumulated Benefit
($) | Payments During Last Fiscal Year ($) | Plan Name
| Number of Years Credited Service
| Present Value of Accumulated Benefit
($) | Payments During Last Fiscal Year ($) |
| Daniel R. Daigneault | Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan | 16.25 | 1,697,000 | - | |
| F. Stephen Ward | Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan | 16.25 | 529,000 | - | Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan | 19.25 | 689,000 | - |
| Tony C. McKim | - | - | - | - |
| Charles A. Wootton | - | - | - | - |
| Susan A. Norton | - | - | - | - |
| Richard M. Elder | | - | - |
The Company does not have Nonqualified Deferred Compensation as part of its compensation program.
Other Employee Benefits
The Bank provides all full-time employees with group life, health, and long-term-disability insurance. A Flexible Benefits Plan is available to all full-time employees after satisfying eligibility requirements and to part-time employees scheduled to work an average of 30 hours per week.
Compensation Policies and Practices
Compensation Programs
The Company has four primary means of compensating its employees: base pay, the Stakeholder bonus program, the short-term incentive plan and the equity-based long-term incentive plan. Full detail on these programs is provided in the Compensation Discussion and Analysis. A summary is provided below.
Base Pay: Base salary is used to recognize the experience, skills and responsibilities of all of the Company’s employees, including its Senior Executive Officers. To determine appropriate levels of base pay for employees other than Senior Executive Officers, the Company participates in a salary survey conducted by Pearl Meyer & Partners. This survey, conducted of financial institutions in New England, provides much of the information needed to determine base pay for hourly employees, line supervisors and members of middle management. In 2014,2016, the Company also utilized the Pearl Meyer & Partners Northeast Banking survey to provide further guidance on base pay for these groups of employees. For the average employee of the Company, it is expected that total compensation will be comprised of base pay, equaling 90%85% to 95%90% of total compensation, and that the Stakeholder Bonus Program will be 5%10% to 10%15% of total compensation. The total compensation mix for Senior Executive Officers is detailed in the Compensation Discussion and Analysis.
Stakeholder Bonus Program:Program: The other key component of compensation for most employees is the Stakeholder Cash Bonus program. This program is not available to SEOs and certain other senior officers. The Stakeholder program was originally implemented in 1994 and is available to all eligible employees (generally employees hired by March 31st of the year for which the bonus is being awarded and still employed at the time the bonus is paid).employees. This element of the performance compensation program is designed to support the long-term viability of the Company and increase shareholder value. It addresses these objectives by tying the performance payout to multiple goals which include profitability, growth, productivity and loan quality. The guiding principle is to reach a balance of these goals, which should collectively have a positive impact on maximizing long-term
shareholder value without incentivizing employees to take undue risk. The Committee believes that this
The First Bancorp 2015 Proxy Statement • Page 27
performance-based program provides a reward for high levels of current performance without sacrificing the achievement of long-term goals. Each year specific key performance indicators are chosen along with company-wideCompany- wide financial performance trigger levels. The objective of the program is to align the performance of employees with the Company’s short- and long-term objectives so neither set of goals is sacrificed for the other.
Short-Term Incentive Plan:Plan: In 2012, the Board of Directors approved a short-term incentive plan for the five SEOs and certain other senior officers of the Company. This element of the compensation program is specifically designed to ensure clarity of expectations in terms of expected results on a short-term basis to recognize and reward achievement of annual business goals and to motivate and reward superior performance. This program also ensures that incentives are appropriately risk-balanced in that they do not motivate or reward excessive risk taking and ensure that the Company is competitive with the market in order to attract and retain talent needed to grow the Company. The short-term incentive is intended to be a cash bonus.
Long-Term Incentive Plan:Plan: In 2010, the Company’s shareholders voted to establish a new equity-based long-termlong- term incentive plan which grants authority to issue stock options, restricted stock and other equity-based grants to retain existing high-performing employees and to attract new members to the Management team should the need arise. The purpose of this plan is to incentivize executives through equity ownershipand align their interests with those of the Shareholders while providing mid‑term and longer-term incentives tied to overall Company performance. It is among the objectives of this plan that, by having a portion of the executive’s compensation tied to the performance of the Company’s stock, the individual will be rewarded for maximizingenhancing long-term shareholder value.
The mid- to long-term outlook of this type of compensation serves as a balance to the short-term rewards of base compensation and the short-term incentive plan. Stock options and restricted stock grants are also intended to encourage an executive to remain with the Company. The amount of options or restricted stock granted reflects the executive’s position in the organization, level of responsibility, impact on the Company’s performance and actual performance in meeting individual performance goals.
Miscellaneous Compensation: In addition to the compensation elements outlined above, the Company also offers a small cash bonus for successful hiring referrals and for referrals to the Company’s investment management division.
Compensation Policies and Practices and Risk Management
Management does not believe that the Company’s compensation policies and practices for its employees are reasonably likely to have a material adverse effect on the Company. Incentive compensation is not tied to individual production volumes or other short-term measures, but is instead focused on a balance of measures which reward enhancing the Company’s long-term viability and performance. The Company has extensive risk monitoring and robust internal controls, and internal and external audit activities provide a deterrent for and a means of detecting such riskyrisk behaviors.
Compensation Committee Certification
During 2014,2016, the Compensation Committee met with Senior Risk Officer, Daniel R. Daigneault,Tony C. McKim, to review the Company’s overall compensation program, for all employees as well as for Senior Executive Officers. Meetings were held on February 10, 2014, May 21, 2014January 28, 2016, and September 18, 2014.22, 2016. The overall risk of the Bank’s compensation programs was discussed at the February 10, 2014 meeting.meeting on January 28, 2016. After discussion with Mr. DaigneaultMcKim and a thorough review of the Company’s compensation programs, the Committee concluded that the compensation program for all employees, including Senior Executive Officers, is balanced, aligning
employees’ interests with those of Shareholders, and is not reasonably likely to have a material adverse effect on the Company, including by incentivizing undue risk-taking.
The First Bancorp 2015 Proxy Statement • Page 28
Use of Compensation Consultants
The Compensation Committee contracted with Pearl Meyer & Partners in 20142016 to conduct a comprehensive analysis of total compensation for the Company’s Senior Executive Officers as well as for other selected members of Management. The Bank also a participated in Pearl Meyer’s salary survey for New England banks to determine salary ranges for other levels of employees as detailed above.
Say on Pay
At the 20142016 Annual Meeting, Shareholders were asked to approve (on a non-binding basis) the compensation of the Company’s executives. The following table presents the results of the voting:
| | | For | Against | Abstain | Broker Non-Vote | Against | Abstain | Broker Non-Vote |
| 6,856,817 | 176,870 | 216,024 | 2,151,439 | |
| 7,119,603 | | 215,777 | 142,060 | 2,454,783 |
The Board of Directors and the Compensation Committee were mindful of this vote as they considered compensation decisions made after the 20142016 Annual Meeting and re-examined overall compensation strategies and philosophy.
The First Bancorp 2015 Proxy Statement • Page 29
Report of the Compensation Committee
FebruaryJanuary 26, 20152017
To the Board of Directors of The First Bancorp, Inc.:
The Compensation Committee of The First Bancorp, Inc. certifies that:
| |
| 1. | It has reviewed with senior risk officers, the senior executive officer (SEO) compensation plans and has made all reasonable efforts to ensure that these plans do not encourage SEOs to take unnecessary and excessive risks that threaten the value of The First Bancorp, Inc. |
| |
| 2. | It has reviewed with senior risk officers the employee compensation plans and has made all reasonable efforts to limit any unnecessary risks these plans pose to The First Bancorp, Inc. |
| |
| 3. | It has reviewed the employee compensation plans to eliminate any features of these plans that would encourage the manipulation of reported earnings of The First Bancorp, Inc. to enhance the compensation of any employee. |
| |
| 4. | It has reviewed and discussed with Management of the Company the Compensation Discussion and Analysis disclosures contained in this Proxy Statement. |
| |
| 5. | Based on the review described in (4) above, it recommended to the Company’s Board of Directors that such Compensation Discussion and Analysis disclosures be included in this Proxy Statement. |
/s/ Carl S. Poole, Jr.
Carl S. Poole, Jr.
/s/ Mark N. Rosborough
Mark N. Rosborough
/s/ Stuart G. Smith
Stuart G. Smith
/s/ David B. Soule, Jr.
David B. Soule, Jr.
/s/ Bruce B. Tindal
Bruce B. Tindal
The First Bancorp 2015 Proxy Statement • Page 30
Certain Relationships and Related Transactions
The Federal Reserve Act permits the Bank to contract for or purchase property from any of its Directors only when such purchase is made in the regular course of business upon terms not less favorable to the Bank than those offered by others unless the purchase has been authorized by a majority of the Board of Directors not interested in the transaction. Similarly, the Federal Reserve Act prohibits loans to Executive Officers of the Bank unless such transactions have been made upon substantially the same terms, including interest rates and collateral, as those prevailing at the same time for comparable transactions with persons not related to the lender, and certain other prescribed conditions have been met.
The Bank has had, and expects to have in the future, banking transactions in the ordinary course of its business with Directors, Executive Officers and principal Shareholders of the Company and their affiliates. All such transactions have been made upon substantially the same terms, including interest rates and collateral, as those prevailing at the same time for comparable transactions with persons not related to the lender and will meet the established written policies of the Bank. Compliance with lending to Directors, Executive Officers and principal Shareholders of the Company is reviewed periodically by the Company’s internal audit function and the results of such audits are reported to the Audit Committee. In the opinion of Management, such loans have not involved more than the normal risk of collectibility nor have they presented other unfavorable features. The total amount of loans outstanding at December 31, 20142016 to the Company’s Directors, Executive Officers and their affiliates was $14,856,556,$23,292,661, which constituted 1.60%2.17% of the Bank’s total loans outstanding at that date.
The First Bancorp 2015 Proxy Statement • Page 31
Director Compensation
Fees paid by the Bank to its Directors as a group totaled $249,157$275,223 in 2014,2016, but no fees are paid to Directors of the Company in their capacities as such. Of the $249,157$275,223 paid to the outside Directors, 51.0%65.1% of this portion was reinvested in the Company through the Employee Stock Purchase Plan. In addition, $13,500 in compensation was paid for other services, as detailed below, and such fees are on terms no more favorable to the recipient than are generally paid by the Bank for such services to other providers in the area. CEO McKim, who is the only Director who is also an employee of the Company, receives no additional compensation for serving on the Board of Directors of the Company or the Bank. The following table of Director Compensation details compensation paid to Directors in 2014.2016.
|
| | | | |
| Name | Fees Earned or Paid in Cash* ($) | All Other Compensation** ($) | Total ($) |
| Katherine M. Boyd | 27,529 | — |
| 27,529 |
| Robert B. Gregory | 33,629 | — |
| 33,629 |
| Carl S. Poole, Jr. | 31,379 | — |
| 31,379 |
| Mark N. Rosborough | 40,062 | — |
| 40,062 |
| Cornelius J. Russell | 18,900 | — |
| 18,900 |
| Stuart G. Smith | 31,429 | — |
| 31,429 |
| David B. Soule | 37,000 | — |
| 37,000 |
| Bruce B. Tindal | 29,229 | 13,500 |
| 42,729 |
|
| | | |
| Name | Fees Earned or Paid in Cash* ($) | | |
| Katherine M. Boyd | 31,500 | | |
| Robert B. Gregory | 30,300 | | |
| Renee W. Kelly | 30,000 | | |
| Mark N. Rosborough | 50,923 | | |
| Cornelius J. Russell | 29,700 | | |
| Stuart G. Smith | 33,300 | | |
| David B. Soule | 39,500 | | |
| Bruce B. Tindal | 30,000 | | |
| |
| * | In 2014,2016, the Chairman of the Board received an annual fee of $37,000.$39,500. Each of the outside Directors of the Bank, with the exception of the Chairman of the Board, received a Director’s fee in the amount of $850$900 for each meeting attended, and $550$600 for each meeting attended of a committee of which the Director is a member. In addition to meeting fees paid for meetings attended, the Chairman of the Audit Committee received a stipend of $8,000 and the Executive Committee Chair received a $6,000 retainer fee.$9,000. Each of the outside Directors also received a monthly retainer of $1,100,$1,200, with the exception of the Chairman of the Board. |
| |
** | Certain Board members were paid fees for other services, and such fees are on terms no more favorable to the recipient than are generally paid by the Bank for such services to other providers in the area. Mr. Tindal is a licensed real estate broker and the amount listed was real estate commission paid to his firm in connection with the sale of bank-owned properties. |
Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance
Section 16(a) of the Exchange Act requires that the Company’s Directors, Executive Officers, and any person holding more than ten percent of the Company’s Common Stock file with the SEC reports of ownership changes, and that such individuals furnish the Company with copies of the reports.
Based solely on a review of the reports furnished to the Company, or written representations from reporting persons that all reportable transactions were reported, the Company believes that during the fiscal year ended December 31, 20142016 the Company’s officers, Directors and greater than ten percent owners timely filed all reports they were required to file under Section 16(a).
The First Bancorp 2015 Proxy Statement • Page 32
PROPOSAL 2 – NON-BINDING VOTE ON THE COMPANY’S EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
As required under the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act, the Board of Directors is submitting for shareholder approval, on an advisory basis, the compensation paid to the Company’s named executive officers as disclosed in this proxy statement. This vote is known as “Say-on-Pay”.
This is a non-binding resolution and accordingly will not have any binding legal effect regardless of whether or not it is approved and may not be construed as overruling a decision by the Company or the Board of Directors or to create or imply any change to the fiduciary duties of the Board. Furthermore, because this non-binding advisory resolution primarily relates to compensation of the named executive officers that has already been paid or contractually committed, there is generally no opportunity for us to revisit those decisions. However, the Compensation Committee intends to take the results of the vote on this proposal into account in its future decisions regarding the compensation of our named executive officers.
Approval of the Company’s executive compensation policies and procedures would require that the number of votes cast in favor of the proposal exceed the number of votes cast against it. Abstentions and broker non votesnon-votes will not be counted as votes cast and therefore will not affect the determination as to whether the Company’s executive compensation policies and procedures are approved. Because this Shareholder vote is advisory, it will not be binding upon the Company’s Board of Directors.
THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS UNANIMOUSLY RECOMMENDS THAT THE SHAREHOLDERS VOTE FOR PROPOSAL NO. 2.
The First Bancorp 2015 Proxy Statement • Page 33
PROPOSAL 3: APPOINTMENT OF AUDITORS
Berry Dunn McNeil & Parker, LLC (BerryDunn) has served as independent auditor for the Company and the Bank since 1994. In the opinion of the Board of Directors, the reputation, qualifications and experience of the firm make its reappointment appropriate for 2015.2017. It is the desire of the Board of Directors Audit Committee that the appointment of BerryDunn as independent auditors be ratified by the Shareholders at the Annual Meeting. Representatives from BerryDunn will be present at the Annual Meeting of Shareholders and will have an opportunity to make a statement if they desire to do so and will be available to respond to appropriate questions from Shareholders.
Under the Act, thisThis proposal will be adopted if the number of shares voted in favor of the proposal exceeds the number of shares voted against the proposal. Broker non-votes and
abstentions will not be included in either total.
THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS UNANIMOUSLY RECOMMENDS THAT THE SHAREHOLDERS VOTE FOR PROPOSAL NO. 3
The First Bancorp 2015 Proxy Statement • Page 34
THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
Disclosure of Audit Fees
Audit Fees
The aggregate fees billed for professional services rendered by the principal accountant, Berry Dunn McNeil & Parker, LLC (Berry Dunn), for the audit of the Company’s annual financial statements and review of interim financial statements included in the Company’s Form 10-K Forms 10-Q and Form S-310-Q filings for the years ended December 31, 20142016 and 20132015 were $169,000$174,000 and $195,000,$170,000, respectively.
Audit-Related Fees
None.
Tax Fees
The aggregate fees billed for professional services rendered by BerryDunn for tax compliance, tax advice and tax planning for the years ended December 31, 20142016 and 20132015 were $16,000$19,000 and $16,000,$19,000, respectively. The nature of the services comprising the fees disclosed under this category are preparation of federal and state tax returns, review of estimated tax payments, review of compliance with information reporting requirements, and tax planning.
All Other Fees
The aggregate fees billed for services provided by BerryDunn, other than the services reported in the paragraphs above, for the years ended December 31, 20142016 and 20132015 were $14,000 and $14,000,$16,000, respectively. The nature of the services comprising the fees disclosed under this category is related to employee benefit plan audits and routine consulting.
None of the services described in each of the paragraphs above were provided under the de minimis exception set forth in Rule 2-01 (c)(7)(i)(C).
The First Bancorp 2015 Proxy Statement • Page 35
Report of the Audit Committee
February 26, 201523, 2017
To the Board of Directors of The First Bancorp, Inc.:
The Audit Committee has reviewed and discussed with Management the Company’s audited financial statements as of and for the year ended December 31, 2014.2016.
The Audit Committee has discussed with the independent auditors the matters required to be discussed by Auditing Standard No. 16(AS) 1301 of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board Interim(PCAOB) Auditing Standards, “Communication with Audit Committees”, and related interpretations and rules.
The Audit Committee has received and reviewed the written disclosures and the letter from the independent auditors required by Independence Standard No. 1, “Independence Discussions with Audit Committees,” as amended, by the Independence Standards Board, and has discussed with the auditors the auditors’ independence.
Based on the reviews and discussions referred to above, the Audit Committee recommends to the Board of Directors that the financial statements referred to above be included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2014.2016.
Each of the members of the Audit Committee is independent as defined under the listing standards of the NASDAQ stock market.
The Company’s Audit Committee Charter, as adopted by the Board of Directors, wasis included in the 2004 Proxy Statementthis document beginning on page 40 and can be accessed on the Company’s website at www.thefirstbancorp.com.
/s/ Mark N. Rosborough
Mark N. Rosborough, Audit Committee Chairman
/s/ Robert B. Gregory
Robert B. Gregory
/s/ David B. Soule, Jr.
David B. Soule, Jr.
The First Bancorp 2015 Proxy Statement • Page 36
Information About Shareholder Proposals
If you wish to submit proposals to be included in the Company’s 20162018 proxy statement for the 20162018 Annual Meeting of Shareholders, the Company must receive them by November 20, 2015,19, 2017, pursuant to the proxy solicitation regulations of the SEC. SEC rules contain standards as to which Shareholder proposals are required to be included in the proxy statement. Any such proposal will be subject to 17 C.F.R. ss.240.14a-8 of the rules and regulations promulgated by the SEC.
Under the Company’s Bylaws, if you wish to nominate a Director or bring other business before an annual meeting, you must be a Shareholder of record and have continuously held at least $2,000 in market value of the Company’s Common Stock (as determined by the President) for at least one year as of the date of submittal of such proposal and continue to hold those securities through the date of such annual meeting.
Your notice must contain specific information required in the Company’s Bylaws.
Shareholder Communication with the Board
Shareholders and other parties interested in communicating directly with the Non-Management Chairman of the Board or with other Non-Management Directors as a group may do so by writing to: Chairman, The First Bancorp, Inc., Post Office Box 940, 223 Main Street, Damariscotta, Maine 04543. The Board approved a process requiring that all such addressed correspondence be reviewed by the Secretary to the Board. The Board Secretary, upon review of the correspondence, will forward to the Non-Management Chairman all such correspondence that deals with the functions of the Board or committees thereof or that she determines requires the attention of the Board.thereof. Concerns relating to accounting, internal controls or auditing matters are immediately brought to the attention of the Company’s Audit Committee Chairman in accordance with procedures established by the Audit Committee with respect to such matters.
Accessing Company Financial Statements and Reports and Online Information
An annual report to Shareholders, including consolidated financial statements of the Company and its subsidiaries prepared in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles, is being distributed to all Company Shareholders of record as of the close of business on February 18, 201515, 2017 and is enclosed herewith.
Shareholders may obtain without charge a copy of the Company’s
Annual Report to the Securities and Exchange Commission on Form 10-K,
Written requests should be directed to F. Stephen Ward, Treasurer, at P.O. Box 940, Damariscotta, ME 04543. Materials may also be accessed online at http://materials.proxyvote.com/31866P. The First Bancorp, Inc.’s website address is www.thefirstbancorp.com. All press releases, SEC filings and other reports or information issued by the Company are available at this website, as well as the Company’s Code of Ethics for Senior Financial Officers, the Company’s Code of Business Conduct and Ethics, Audit Committee Charter, Nominating/Governance Committee Charter, and Compensation Committee Charter.
Other Matters
The Annual Meeting is called for the purposes set forth in this notice. Management is not aware of any other matter that will come before the meeting. However, if any other business should come before the meeting, your Proxy, if signed and returned, will give to the persons designated in it discretionary authority to vote according to their best judgment. It is the intention of the persons named in the Proxy to vote pursuant to the Proxy in accordance with the recommendations of Management.
By Order of the Board of Directors
/s/ Charles A. Wootton
Charles A. Wootton, Clerk
Damariscotta, Maine, March 20, 20152017
The First Bancorp 2015 Proxy Statement • Page 37
THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK
Appendix A - Audit Committee Charter
Committee Membership
The Audit Committee of The First Bancorp, Inc. (the “Company”) shall be comprised of at least three directors each of whom is (i) “independent” under the rules of the Nasdaq Stock Market, Inc., except as provided below, and under the Sarbanes‑Oxley Act of 2002, and the rules promulgated thereunder, (ii) does not accept, directly or indirectly, any consulting, advisory or other compensatory fee from the Company or any of its subsidiaries other than in his or her capacity as a member of the Board or any committee of the Board, (iii) is not an “affiliate” of the Company or any subsidiary of the Company, as such term is defined in Rule 10A‑3 under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”), (iv) has not participated in the preparation of the financial statements of the Company or any subsidiary at any time during the preceding three years, (v) a person none of whose Family Members has served as an executive officer of the Company or any subsidiary at any time during the preceding three years, or as an executive officer of another entity where at any time during the preceding three years any of the executive officers of the Company or any subsidiary served on that other entity's compensation committee, and (vi) a person none of whose Family Members is a current partner of the Company's outside auditor, or was a partner or employee of the Company's outside auditor who worked on the Company's audit at any time during any of the preceding three years. For purposes hereof, “affiliate” means a person who directly, or indirectly through one or more intermediaries, controls, or is controlled by, or is under common control with, the person specified. A person is deemed not to be in control of an entity if he or she is not an executive officer of the entity and is not the beneficial owner, directly or indirectly, of more than 10% of any class of voting equity securities of the entity. “Indirect” acceptance by a Committee member of any consulting, advisory or compensatory fee includes acceptance of such a fee by a spouse, parent, child, sibling, or anyone sharing a home with the Committee member (a “Family Member”), or an entity in which such Committee member or Family Member is a partner, member, an officer such as “managing director” occupying a comparable position or executive officer, or occupies a similar position (except limited partners, non‑managing members and those occupying similar positions who, in each case, have no active role in providing services to the Company or any subsidiary) and which entity provides accounting, consulting, legal, investment banking or financial advisory services to the Company or any subsidiary. With respect to clause (ii) of this paragraph, payments received (directly or indirectly) from the Company or any subsidiary by a Committee member or Family Member during the three years ending December 31, 2013 shall not render such Committee member not “independent” if such payments did not exceed, in any year, the greater of (a) $200,000, or (b) 5% of the recipient's consolidated gross revenues.
All members of the Committee must be able to read and understand fundamental financial statements, including a company's balance sheet, income statement, and cash flow statement.
Notwithstanding the second preceding paragraph, one director who is not “independent” under the rules of the Nasdaq Stock Market, Inc., who does not accept any consulting, advisory or other compensatory fee from the Company or any subsidiary other than in his or her capacity as a member of the Board or any committee of the Board, who is not an “affiliate” of the Company or any subsidiary of the Company, as such term is defined in Rule 10A‑3 under the Exchange Act, and who is not a current officer or employee, or a spouse, parent, child or sibling, whether by blood, marriage or adoption, of, or a person who has the same residence as, any current officer or employee of the Company or any subsidiary, may be appointed to the Committee if the Board, under exceptional and limited circumstances, shall have determined that such individual's membership on the Committee is required by the best interests of the Company and its stockholders, and the Board discloses, in the next annual meeting proxy statement subsequent to such determination, the nature of the relationship, and the reasons for the determination. Any such member appointed to the Committee may only serve for up to two years and may not chair the Committee.
Members shall be appointed by the Board based on nominations recommended by the Company's Nominating Committee, and shall serve at the pleasure of the Board and for such term or terms as the Board may determine.
Committee Purposes
The purpose of the Audit Committee is to oversee the accounting and financial reporting processes of the Company and the audits of the financial statements of the Company, and to function as the Company's “qualified legal compliance committee” as required under 17 C.F.R. Part 205.
The function of the Committee is oversight with respect to the matters described above, and to ensure the independence of the Company's independent auditors. The management of the Company is responsible for the preparation, presentation and integrity of the Company's consolidated financial statements. Management is responsible for maintaining appropriate
accounting and financial reporting principles and policies as well as internal controls and procedures designed to assure compliance with accounting standards and applicable laws and regulations. The independent public accountants are responsible for planning and performing proper audits, including an audit of the Company's annual consolidated financial statements filed as part of its Form 10-K, and certain other accounting procedures, including reviews of the Company's unaudited interim consolidated financial statements prior to the filing of each quarterly report on Form 10-Q. The Committee is responsible for maintaining open communication between the Committee and the independent public accountants, internal auditors, management, and the Board of Directors with respect to the matters within the scope of the Committee's responsibilities as set forth in this Charter.
The Committee is entitled to place reasonable reliance on (i) the integrity of those persons and organizations within and outside the Company from whom and from which it receives information and (ii) the accuracy of the financial and other information provided to the Committee by such persons or organizations.
The Company's independent auditors shall submit to the Audit Committee annually a formal written statement (the “Auditors' Statement”) describing: the auditors' internal quality‑control procedures; any material issues raised by the most recent internal quality‑control review or peer review of the auditors, or by any inquiry or investigation by governmental or professional authorities, within the preceding five years, respecting one or more independent audits carried out by the auditors, and any steps taken to deal with any such issues; and (to assess the auditors' independence) all relationships between the independent auditors and the Company or any subsidiary, including each non‑audit service provided to the Company or any subsidiary and at least the matters set forth in Independence Standards Board No. 1.
The independent auditors shall submit to the Audit Committee annually a formal written statement of the fees billed in each of the last two fiscal years for each of the following categories of services rendered to the Company or any subsidiary by the independent auditors: (i) the audit of the Company's annual financial statements and the reviews of the financial statements included in the Company's Quarterly Reports on Form 10‑Q or services that are normally provided by the independent auditors in connection with statutory and regulatory filings or engagements; (ii) assurance and related services not included in clause (i) that are reasonably related to the performance of the audit or review of the Company's financial statements, in the aggregate and by each service; (iii) tax compliance, tax advice and tax planning services, in the aggregate and by each service; and (iv) all other products and services rendered by the independent auditors, in the aggregate and by each service.
Committee Duties and Responsibilities
To carry out its purposes, the Audit Committee shall have the following duties and responsibilities.
| |
| A. | With respect to the Company's independent auditors, |
| |
| i. | to be directly responsible for the appointment, compensation, retention and oversight of the work of the independent auditors (including the resolution of disagreements between management and the independent auditors regarding financial reporting), who shall report directly to the Audit Committee; provided that the auditor appointment shall be subject to shareholder ratification; |
| |
| ii. | to be directly responsible for the appointment, compensation, retention and oversight of the work of any other registered public accounting firm engaged for the purpose of preparing or issuing an audit report or to perform audit, review or attestation services for the Company, which firm shall also report directly to the Audit Committee; |
| |
| iii. | to pre-approve, or to adopt appropriate procedures to pre‑approve, all audit and non‑audit services to be provided by the independent auditors; |
| |
| iv. | to ensure that the independent auditors prepare and deliver annually an Auditors' Statement (it being understood that the independent auditors are responsible for the accuracy and completeness of this Statement), and to discuss with the independent auditors any relationships or services disclosed in this Statement that may impact the quality of audit services or the objectivity and independence of the Company's independent auditors; |
| |
| v. | to obtain from the independent auditors in connection with any audit a timely report relating to the Company's annual audited financial statements describing all critical accounting policies and practices used, all alternative treatments within generally accepted accounting principles for policies and practices related to material items that have been discussed with management, ramifications of the use of such alternative disclosures and treatments, and the treatment preferred by the independent auditors, and any material written communications between the independent auditors and management, such as any “management” letter or schedule of unadjusted differences; |
| |
| vi. | to review and evaluate the qualifications, performance and independence of the lead partner of the independent auditors; and |
| |
| vii. | to discuss with management the timing and process for implementing the rotation of the lead audit partner, the concurring partner and any other active audit engagement team partner and consider whether there should be a regular rotation of the audit firm itself; and to take into account the opinions of management and the Company's internal auditors in assessing the independent auditors' qualifications, performance and independence. |
| |
| B. | With respect to the internal auditing function, |
| |
| i. | to review the appointment and replacement of the third party engaged to perform the internal audit function; and |
| |
| ii. | to advise the third party engaged to perform the internal audit function that he, she or it is expected to provide to the Audit Committee summaries of and, as appropriate, the significant reports to management prepared by the third party engaged to perform the internal audit function and management's responses thereto. |
| |
| C. | With respect to accounting principles and policies, financial reporting and internal audit control over financial reporting, |
| |
| i. | to advise management, the third party engaged to perform the internal audit function and the independent auditors that they are expected to provide to the Audit Committee a timely analysis of significant issues and practices relating to accounting principles and policies, financial reporting and internal control over financial reporting; |
| |
| ii. | to consider any reports or communications (and management's and/or third party internal auditor's responses thereto) submitted to the Audit Committee by the independent auditors required by or referred to in SAS 61 (as codified by AU Section 380), as it may be modified or supplemented or other professional standards, including reports and communications related to: |
| |
| ▪ | deficiencies, including significant deficiencies or material weaknesses, in internal control identified during the audit or other matters relating to internal control over financial reporting; |
| |
| ▪ | consideration of fraud in a financial statement audit; |
| |
| ▪ | detection of illegal acts; |
| |
| ▪ | the independent auditors' responsibility under generally accepted auditing standards; |
| |
| ▪ | any restriction on audit scope; |
| |
| ▪ | significant accounting policies; |
| |
| ▪ | management judgments and accounting estimates; |
| |
| ▪ | any accounting adjustments arising from the audit that were noted or proposed by the auditors but were passed (as immaterial or otherwise); |
| |
| ▪ | the responsibility of the independent auditors for other information in documents containing audited financial statements; |
| |
| ▪ | disagreements with management; |
| |
| ▪ | consultation by management with other accountants; |
| |
| ▪ | major issues discussed with management prior to retention of the independent auditors; |
| |
| ▪ | difficulties encountered with management in performing the audit; |
| |
| ▪ | the independent auditors' judgments about the quality of the Company's accounting principles; |
| |
| ▪ | reviews of interim financial information conducted by the independent auditors; and |
| |
| ▪ | the responsibilities, budget and staffing of the Company's internal audit function; |
| |
| iii. | to meet with management, the independent auditors and, if appropriate, the third party engaged to perform the internal audit function: |
| |
| ▪ | to discuss the scope of the annual audit; |
| |
| ▪ | to discuss the annual audited financial statements and quarterly financial statements, including the Company's disclosures under “Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations”; |
| |
| ▪ | to discuss any significant matters arising from any audit, including any audit problems or difficulties, whether raised by management, the third party engaged to perform the informal audit function or the independent auditors, relating to the Company's financial statements; |
| |
| ▪ | to discuss any difficulties the independent auditors encountered in the course of the audit, including any restrictions on their activities or access to requested information and any significant disagreements with management; |
| |
| ▪ | to discuss any “management” or “internal control” letter issued, or proposed to be issued, by the independent auditors to the Company; |
| |
| ▪ | to review the form of opinion the independent auditors propose to render to the Board of Directors and shareholders; and |
| |
| ▪ | to discuss, as appropriate: (a) any major issues regarding accounting principles and financial statement presentations, including any significant changes in the Company's selection or application of accounting principles, and major issues as to the adequacy of the Company's internal controls and any special audit steps adopted in light of material control deficiencies; (b) analyses prepared by management and/or the independent auditors setting forth significant financial reporting issues and judgments made in connection with the preparation of the financial statements, including analyses of the effects of alternative GAAP methods on the financial statements; and (c) the effect of regulatory and accounting initiatives, as well as off‑balance sheet structures, on the financial statements of the Company; |
| |
| iv. | to inquire of the Company's chief executive officer and chief financial officer as to the existence of any significant deficiencies or material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the Company's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information, and as to the existence of any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the Company's internal control over financial reporting; |
| |
| v. | to discuss guidelines and policies governing the process by which senior management of the Company and the relevant departments of the Company assess and manage the Company's exposure to risk, and to discuss the Company's major financial risk exposures and the steps management has taken to monitor and control such exposures; |
| |
| vi. | to obtain from the independent auditors assurance that the audit was conducted in a manner consistent with Section 10A of the Exchange Act, which sets forth certain procedures to be followed in any audit of financial statements required under the Exchange Act; |
| |
| vii. | to discuss with the Company's counsel any significant legal, compliance or regulatory matters that may have a material effect on the financial statements or the Company's business, financial statements or compliance policies, including material notices to or inquiries received from governmental agencies; |
| |
| viii. | to discuss and review the type and presentation of information to be included in earnings press releases; |
| |
| ix. | to discuss the types of financial information and earnings guidance provided, and the types of presentations made, to analysts and rating agencies; and |
| |
| x. | to establish procedures for the receipt, retention and treatment of complaints received by the Company regarding accounting, internal accounting controls or auditing matters, and for the confidential, anonymous submission by Company employees of concerns regarding questionable accounting or auditing matters. |
| |
| D. | With respect to its role as the Company's qualified legal compliance committee, to review and discuss any reports concerning material violations submitted to it by outside counsel pursuant to the SEC attorney professional responsibility rules (17 C.F.R. Part 205). In connection with such reports, the Audit Committee shall inform the Company's President of any report received by it of evidence of a material violation of federal or state securities laws, a possible material breach of fiduciary duty arising under federal or state law, or a similar material violation of any federal or state law, in each case by the Company or any of its officers, directors, employees or agents (a “Material Violation”) and which report contains credible evidence based upon which it would be unreasonable under the circumstances for a prudent and competent attorney not to conclude that it is reasonably likely that a Material Violation has occurred, is ongoing, or is about to occur. Such reports may originate from attorneys representing the Company, from Company employees or otherwise. However, if the Audit Committee determines that informing the President would be futile or otherwise inappropriate, it shall instead inform the other members of the Board thereof. The Audit Committee shall determine whether an investigation with respect to such report as to a possible Material Violation is necessary and, if it so determines, shall so notify the Board and initiate such investigation, to be conducted by counsel selected by the Committee with the involvement of such other expert personnel as the Committee deems necessary. At the conclusion of any such investigation, the Committee shall recommend, by majority vote, that the Company implement an appropriate response to evidence of a Material Violation and inform the President and the Board of the results of such investigation and the appropriate remedial measures to be adopted. The Committee has the authority and the responsibility, acting by majority vote, to take all other appropriate action, including the authority to notify the SEC in the event that the Company fails in any material respect to implement an appropriate response that the Committee has recommended the Company to take. |
Any report of a Material Violation submitted to the Audit Committee in good faith, and the identity of the person submitting it (if an employee or director), shall be kept confidential (both by the submitting person and the recipient(s) thereof) and disclosed only to Audit Committee members, Board members, legal counsel and other
experts retained by the Audit Committee, and senior executives and other personnel of the Company having, in the judgment of the Audit Committee, a need to know the contents of the report in order for the Audit Committee to effectively evaluate and, if appropriate, investigate and take further action with respect to the subject matter of the report. There shall be no retaliatory action whatsoever taken with respect to any person who submits such a report in good faith. The fact that such reports should be submitted to a member of the Audit Committee, and the provisions of this paragraph, should be communicated to all Company employees promptly following the adoption of this Charter, at the time of hiring of any Company employees hired after the adoption of this Charter, and on a recurring basis at least annually.
| |
| E. | With respect to reporting and recommendations, |
| |
| i. | to prepare any report or other disclosures, including any recommendation of the Audit Committee, required by the rules of the SEC to be included in the Company's annual proxy statement; |
| |
| ii. | to review and reassess the adequacy of this Charter at least annually and recommend any changes to the full Board of Directors; and |
| |
| iii. | to report its activities to the full Board of Directors on a regular basis and to make such recommendations with respect to the above and other matters as the Audit Committee may deem necessary or appropriate. |
Committee Structure and Operations
The Audit Committee Chair is designated by the Company's Board of Directors. The Audit Committee shall meet once every fiscal quarter, or more frequently if circumstances dictate, to discuss with management the annual audited financial statements and quarterly financial statements, as applicable. The Audit Committee should meet periodically with management, the third party engaged to perform the internal audit function and the independent auditors to discuss any matters that the Audit Committee or any of these persons or firms believe should be discussed privately. The Audit Committee may request any officer or employee of the Company or the Company's outside counsel or independent auditors to attend a meeting of the Audit Committee or to meet with any members of, or consultants to, the Audit Committee. Members of the Audit Committee may participate in a meeting of the Audit Committee by means of conference call or similar communications equipment by means of which all persons participating in the meeting can hear each other.
Delegation to Subcommittee
The Audit Committee may, in its discretion, delegate all or a portion of its duties and responsibilities to a subcommittee of the Audit Committee. The Audit Committee may, in its discretion, delegate to one or more of its members the authority to pre‑approve any audit or non‑audit services to be performed by the independent auditors, provided that any such approvals are presented to the Audit Committee at its next scheduled meeting.
Resources and Authority of the Audit Committee
The Audit Committee shall have the resources and authority appropriate to discharge its duties and responsibilities, including the authority to select, retain, terminate, and approve the fees and other retention terms of special or independent counsel, accountants or other experts and advisors, as it deems necessary or appropriate, without seeking approval of the Board or management. The Committee will have full access to the Company's books, records, facilities, and personnel. The Committee has the authority and available funding to perform or supervise special investigations and to incur administrative expenses in connection with fulfilling its obligations. The Committee will have the sole authority to approve fees and related terms of such engagements for outside experts.
The Company shall provide for appropriate funding, as determined by the Audit Committee, in its capacity as a committee of the Board, for payment of:
| |
| 1. | Compensation to the independent auditors and any other public accounting firm engaged for the purpose of preparing or issuing an audit report or performing other audit, review or attest services for the Company; |
| |
| 2. | Compensation of any advisers employed by the Audit Committee; and |
| |
| 3. | Ordinary administrative expenses of the Audit Committee that are necessary or appropriate in carrying out its duties. |
THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK
The First Bancorp 20152017 Proxy Statement • Page 3847